Browse through our Interesting Nodes of Newsletters & Journals on Hellenic Issues Read the Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (24 July 1923) Read the Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (24 July 1923)
HR-Net - Hellenic Resources Network Compact version
Today's Suggestion
Read The "Macedonian Question" (by Maria Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou)
HomeAbout HR-NetNewsWeb SitesDocumentsOnline HelpUsage InformationContact us
Friday, 29 March 2024
 
News
  Latest News (All)
     From Greece
     From Cyprus
     From Europe
     From Balkans
     From Turkey
     From USA
  Announcements
  World Press
  News Archives
Web Sites
  Hosted
  Mirrored
  Interesting Nodes
Documents
  Special Topics
  Treaties, Conventions
  Constitutions
  U.S. Agencies
  Cyprus Problem
  Other
Services
  Personal NewsPaper
  Greek Fonts
  Tools
  F.A.Q.
 

OMRI Pursuing Balkan Peace, No. 20, 96-05-21

Open Media Research Institute: Pursuing Balkan Peace Directory - Previous Article - Next Article

From: Open Media Research Institute <http://www.omri.cz>

Pursuing Balkan Peace
No. 20, 21 May 1996


CONTENTS

  • [01] THE ONGOING MYSTERY OF RADOVAN KARADZIC.
  • [02] NEW BOSNIAN SERB PREMIER IS HARD LINE.
  • [03] BOSNIAN SERBS PLAY FOR TIME.
  • [04] PRESSURE TO CATCH KARADZIC GROWS.
  • [05] A NEW PUBLICATION IN DOBOJ . . .
  • [06] . . . AND GREEK MONEY AND IDEAS FOR THE REPUBLIKA SRPSKA.
  • [07] BANJA LUKA IN THE NEWS.
  • [08] BOSNIAN SERB AUTHORITIES HARASS INDEPENDENT RADIO.
  • [09] SERBS FACE HURDLES IN GOING HOME TO SARAJEVO.
  • [10] CALLS FOR MOSTAR ELECTIONS TO BE POSTPONED.
  • [11] U.S. OFFICIAL RESIGNS OVER SCHEDULING OF BOSNIAN ELECTIONS . . .
  • [12] . . . WHILE THE UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES WARNS FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT IS RESTRICTED.
  • [13] YET ANOTHER CROAT-MUSLIM MILITARY AGREEMENT.
  • [14] WHO ARE THE SEVEN MYSTERIOUS BOSNIAN MUSLIMS?
  • [15] RUMP YUGOSLAV ARMY DEBATES WAR CRIMINALS' FATE.
  • [16] WAR CRIMES OFFICE TO OPEN IN BELGRADE.
  • [17] THE BOSNIAN SERB LEADERSHIP IMBROGLIO: THE VIEW ON THE GROUND.

  • [01] THE ONGOING MYSTERY OF RADOVAN KARADZIC.

    The preceding week witnessed some sudden turns on the Bosnian Serb political scene. First, Nasa Borba on 15 May reported that the Bosnian Serb civilian leader and indicted war criminal Radovan Karadzic announced he will run in the upcoming elections, and said that the international community is just wasting its time trying to find moderate Bosnian Serbs to counterbalance him. In order to underscore this last statement, that same day Karadzic dismissed Prime Minister Rajko Kasagic, regarded and promoted by the West as a moderate alternative to the Pale-based hardliners. Kasagic earlier called on Bosnian Serb leaders to respect all aspects of the Dayton peace agreement, which among other things calls for the handover of war criminals like Karadzic himself. Karadzic said Kasagic was discharged because he had "considerably harmed the Republika Srpska" by not being "up to his task," AFP reported. Another Bosnian Serb hardliner, Foreign Minister Aleksa Buha, was quoted by the Bosnian Serb agency SRNA as calling Kasagic a "loose cannon," who, "instead of coordinating and initiating ministerial activity and dedicating all his efforts to restarting the economy . . . threw himself into political grandstanding."

    The international community immediately slammed Karadzic for sacking his premier, and NATO Secretary-General Javier Solana said the decision was "null and void." The very next day Solana met with Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic urging him to see to it that Kasagic remains prime minister. The international community's High Representative for Bosnia Carl Bildt condemned Karadzic for his move, which he described as "a coup that runs against the full implementation of the peace agreement." Bildt called for a "robust" international response; and on 16 May issued a statement jointly with Kasagic saying they will continue to work together to break the forces of isolationism that threaten implementation of the peace agreement. Possibly encouraged by the international support, Kasagic said that Karadzic was not a "legitimate leader" of the Bosnian Serbs because "he had not been elected by the people as called for in the constitution but rather by a self-proclaimed parliament.! " Meanwhile, Milosevic told U.S. g overnment officials he would ignore the dismissal, which both the Serbian and rump Yugoslav governments condemned as "illegal, null and void." Some Bosnian Serb opposition parties and parliamentary deputies publicly backed up Kasagic.

    At one moment it seemed as if the international community was going to be successful in influencing the course of events in Pale. However, on 18 May the Bosnian Serb parliament formally backed Karadzic regarding the sacking of Kasagic by 84 votes to 43, and endorsed the appointment of Gojko Klickovic as the new prime minister. Later that day Kasagic said he accepted the assembly's decision: "I have been dismissed and I accept the decision of parliament," AFP quoted him as saying. Meanwhile, immediately after Karadzic had appointed the new premier, Bildt went to Pale, where he again tried to speed up Karadzic's political demise. The next day Bildt visited Milosevic, whom he had earlier accused of failing to fulfill his part of the Dayton accords by permitting Kasagic's dismissal.

    That same day, rump Yugoslavia's Tanjug news agency reported that Karadzic had stepped down as president of the Republika Srpska, but SRNA said that he only delegated some of his functions to Vice President Biljana Plavsic. On 19 May Bildt visited Pale again, seeking from the Bosnian Serb leadership a clearer statement on Karadzic's resignation. On his way back to Sarajevo, Bildt said he wanted a unambiguous declaration from the Serb leadership that Karadzic was stepping down completely. Plavsic said on 20 May, however, that Karadzic is still president. Some opposition figures in Belgrade and Banja Luka say that, in any event, Karadzic has ensured the continuation of his policies -- whether he himself stays around or not -- by appointing persons at least as hard-line as he is. -- Daria Sito Sucic

    [02] NEW BOSNIAN SERB PREMIER IS HARD LINE.

    And Klickovic is certainly as nationalistic as his sponsor. The new prime minister was recently in charge of organizing the exodus of the Sarajevo Serbs, which was characterized by massive intimidation, looting, and arson, AFP reported on 18 May. In his first comment to reporters after taking up his new job, Klickovic struck a hard line by opposing any single Bosnian state, which is the cornerstone of the Dayton peace accord. AFP on 19 May quoted him as saying that "integration within Bosnia is out of the question." Klickovic added that the Serb people will "never allow" Karadzic to be sent to the Hague- based war crimes tribunal because "there is no reason for him to go there. One who fights for the freedom of his people and defends his people cannot be guilty." -- Daria Sito Sucic

    [03] BOSNIAN SERBS PLAY FOR TIME.

    The scenes of the past weekend were, moreover, familiar to those who have long followed the Bosnian conflict: an international negotiator met in a series of sessions with Bosnian Serb leaders, Milosevic, and then with the Bosnian Serbs again. He never received a direct answer to his main demand -- in this case that Karadzic be dumped as president -- but rather a series of promises that seemed to go at least part way to that end. Bildt was told that Karadzic would "be neither seen nor heard," that a referendum would be held, that Plavsic would take over his international obligations, etc.. Karadzic, however, has no foreign duties because no representative from abroad is supposed to meet with the indicted war criminal. The Dayton agreement, moreover, says clearly that he has no political future and that Milosevic is obliged to help hunt him down and bring him to justice. Much of Bosnian opinion regards the latest moves from Pale as "cosmetic," Oslobodjenje reported on 20 May. -- Patrick Moore

    [04] PRESSURE TO CATCH KARADZIC GROWS.

    Even before these latest developments -- namely at the conclusion of meetings in Washington to shore up the shaky Croat-Muslim federation -- federal Vice President Ejup Ganic again demanded that IFOR catch Karadzic and fellow indicted war criminal Gen. Ratko Mladic. The U.S. maintains, however, that Milosevic is responsible for arresting them and handing them over to the war crimes tribunal in The Hague, AFP reported on 17 May. Diplomats in Sarajevo are nonetheless rethinking whether it might not be a good idea after all to go after Karadzic in view of his role in the current Bosnian Serb power struggle and the growing feeling that there will be no free elections with him on the loose. Meanwhile in The Hague, the indicted Bosnian Serb Goran Lajic told the court that he is not guilty and that the case against him is based on mistaken identity. And on 18 May, Gen. Djordje Djukic died of cancer in Belgrade soon after being released from The Hague on humanitarian grounds. Serbian media suggested that he died as a result of harsh treatment at the tribunal. -- Patrick Moore and Stan Markotich

    [05] A NEW PUBLICATION IN DOBOJ . . .

    There have been, moreover, other news stories regarding the Bosnian Serbs but which have not landed in the media limelight. One is that the independent bi- weekly Alternativa has launched publication in Doboj, which is generally regarded as a nationalist stronghold. The owner of the paper is Major Stankovic, who was well known during the war on all sides for his military professionalism and his humane treatment of prisoners. Alternativa provides an outlet for numerous writers unable to publish otherwise in the Republika Srpska. Its first issue, moreover, contained an interview with Kasagic in which he pleaded for "tolerance and interethnic reconciliation." -- Yvonne Badal in Sarajevo

    [06] . . . AND GREEK MONEY AND IDEAS FOR THE REPUBLIKA SRPSKA.

    Another little-known bit of news is that Greece is investing heavily in the RS. The Banja Luka regime paper Glas Srpski on 8 May wrote that $100 million is coming in Greek government credits to relaunch industrial enterprises. The Greek telecommunications company OTE offered, moreover, a "master plan" for all RS telecommunications needs, including military ones. OTE has DM 400, 000 for the project, about which the RS PTT director said: "We decided to choose our Greek friends for many reasons but mainly because you do not give this important information about our telecommunications to just anybody." The plan will enable the RS "not to be in a telephone dependency on the other entity," i.e. the Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Bildt's office and the OSCE refused to comment on a question as to whether Greece as a NATO and EU member is not obliged to assist in carrying out the Dayton agreement, which stresses that Bosnia-Herzegovina is a single state. -- Jan Urban in Sarajevo

    [07] BANJA LUKA IN THE NEWS.

    The Serbian power struggle has, meanwhile, thrown a spotlight on Banja Luka, the largest city in the Republika Srpska and home now to 240,000 people, many of whom are refugees from rural areas. During the war the place was known to the UN as "the heart of darkness" because of the ruthlessness of the Serbs in driving out the Muslims and Croats and in destroying historic mosques. Karadzic's power today is represented by the police and by the nationalist segment of the political spectrum, in which his Serbian Democratic Party (SDS) is the largest single force. The second element in the spectrum is that close to Milosevic and represented by the Socialist Party of the Republika Srpska. The third division in Banja Luka political life centers on those parties and groups committed to a modern civil society, or the "Dayton Bosnia." These include Miodrag Zivanovic's Social Liberal Party and Milorad Dodik's Social Democrats. Dodik, however, on 8 May withdrew from a press conference called to launch a union of a number of centrist groupings just 40 minutes before it was to open, prompting Zivanovic to tell OMRI that "Dodik is Milosevic's man." The Serbian president, the Liberal leader continued, wants to create instead as broad an anti-Karadzic front as possible, and not just limited to the rather anti-nationalist part of the spectrum. Zivanovic is, moreover, cautious, noting that "our dreams must be for the future" and that "the country is not yet ripe for building democratic institutions."

    Karadzic and his supporters, for their part, seek to put opposition politicians and independent journalists under pressure, from which slander, threats and violence are not excluded (see below). Independent Bosnian Serb journalists told OMRI, however, that big changes could be in the offing if Milosevic abandons the Republika Srpska west of Brcko as he did the Krajina Serbs. This would leave Banja Luka to "gravitate toward Zagreb," as it did before the war, the journalists concluded. It is unclear what such a move would mean for the Dayton system.

    The educational picture is, moreover, at least as topsy-turvy as the political one. Once known for its fine school system, Banja Luka's educational policy today is subordinated to the Republika Srpska's version of "political correctness." Thus one teacher recently told her class that now she can reveal "the centuries-old secret of the Vatican, namely that Jesus Christ was a Serbian Orthodox." Other reports say that not only has the Belgrade dialect of Serbo-Croatian been imposed on the local and rather different form, but that the Cyrillic alphabet dominates to the point that it finds its way into English and German lessons. -- Yvonne Badal in Sarajevo and Patrick Moore

    [08] BOSNIAN SERB AUTHORITIES HARASS INDEPENDENT RADIO.

    The Banja Luka station Radio Big was taken off the air briefly on 20 May but later was allowed to resume broadcasting. The authorities said that the programming was cut because the station "had not paid its electricity bill." This is a typical example of the legal or technical arguments used in Serbia and in Croatia to silence independent media, and editor Igor Crnadak called it "organized harassment." It is not clear how or why the station was allowed to resume broadcasting, AFP said. The privately-owned station is easily the most popular one in the northern part of the Republika Srpska and is the only one to give anything like impartial coverage of the ongoing power struggle between Bosnian Serb leaders. There are very few non-regime media in the Republika Srpska, but they include Radio Big and the opposition newspaper Novi Prelom , both of which are based in Banja Luka. -- Patrick Moore

    [09] SERBS FACE HURDLES IN GOING HOME TO SARAJEVO.

    Returning to the Bosnian capital, the anti-nationalist Serbian Civic Council (SGV), which remained loyal to the Bosnian government throughout the war, says that several legal difficulties stand in the way of Serbs wanting to live in Sarajevo again. Many of these people were among the 60,000 pressured by the Bosnian Serb authorities into abandoning their flats and houses earlier this year but now want to go back after spending months in makeshift camps. The SGV says that they have difficulty in obtaining Bosnian passports, however, and that their flats have been occupied by Muslim refugees from Srebrenica and Zepa, Onasa noted on 18 May. A group of independent intellectuals charged that all three sides are practicing "silent ethnic cleansing" and point to Sarajevo, Banja Luka, and both parts of Mostar as examples, Oslobodjenje noted on 20 May. Elsewhere, the SGV joined Muslim parties in criticizing the current rules for the May elections in Mostar, saying that they make it impossible for 90% of the Serbs from there to vote because refugees are barred from the ballot. --

    Patrick Moore

    [10] CALLS FOR MOSTAR ELECTIONS TO BE POSTPONED.

    Nor do the Mostar Muslims like the rules, even though their mayor had earlier approved them. The Muslims on 20 May sent a letter to EU administrator Ricardo Peres Casado requesting a postponement of the vote but did not specify a new date, AFP reported. That same day former Prime Minister Haris Silajdzic called for the Mostar elections to be held in September to coincide with the general ones Meanwhile, Muhamed Sacirbey, Bosnia's ambassador to the UN and one of the framers of the Dayton peace accord's section on Mostar, said the signing of the election rules in the peace accord was a matter of mutual misunderstanding between the Bosnians on one side and the international community on the other, Oslobodjenje reported on 21 May. He said that he and his colleague Safet Orucevic had clearly understood that refugees would be allowed to vote. -- Daria Sito Sucic

    [11] U.S. OFFICIAL RESIGNS OVER SCHEDULING OF BOSNIAN ELECTIONS . . .

    William Steubner, chief of staff of the OSCE mission, has also protested some election rules, but this time those for the Bosnia-wide ballot slated for mid- September at the latest. The American resigned to object to the timing, AFP reported on 15 May. Steubner believes September is too early to meet OSCE conditions for the elections, such as setting up free media, enforcing the right of refugees and displaced people to return to their pre-war homes to vote, and excluding indicted war criminals from the electoral process. Robert Frowick, the head of the OSCE mission in Bosnia, told The Washington Post he was greatly pressured to guarantee that the Bosnian elections would be held in September, as scheduled in the Dayton peace accord. Frowick stressed that the dangers of postponing the vote were greater than those of holding it on time. - - Daria Sito Sucic

    [12] . . . WHILE THE UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES WARNS FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT IS RESTRICTED.

    And on the key issues of freedom of movement and the right of refugees to go home, Sadako Ogata said on 13 May that freedom of movement remains "severely restricted" in Bosnia, citing Mostar as an example, AFP reported. She also warned European governments that they would "destabilize the fragile peace" if they sent home 700,000 Bosnian refugees prematurely, Onasa reported. That same day, the ministers for refugees of the Republika Srpska, of the Bosnian Federation, and of Bosnia-Herzegovina signed a joint declaration saying they would encourage individuals expelled by ethnic cleansing to visit their homes. The declaration is based on the 10 principles introduced by UNHCR that regulate visits of returnees to their pre-war homes, Nasa Borba reported on 14 May. -- Daria Sito Sucic

    [13] YET ANOTHER CROAT-MUSLIM MILITARY AGREEMENT.

    Nor was this the only document of dubious practical value to make the news. Croatian Foreign Minister Mate Granic, Bosnian Croat leader and federal President Kresimir Zubak, federal Vice President Ejup Ganic, and Bosnian Prime Minister Hasan Muratovic were among the dozen or so participants attending a "forum" in Washington to shore up the shaky Croat-Muslim federation. (The Belgrade daily Nasa Borba said that the Croats and Muslims had been summoned by their American sponsors to an "informative discussion," which in Serbia is a euphemism for a police interrogation.) U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher said it is important to strengthen the federation as a cornerstone of the Dayton peace agreement. He and Zubak made optimistic statements, but Ganic slammed international peacekeepers for not only not arresting indicted war criminals Karadzic and Mladic, but for also sharing "the same roof" with them, AFP reported on 14 May. The Croats and Muslims signed an agreement that same day to unite their armed forces under a common defense ministry within three years. They have made and reneged on several such promises before, but the rather long and hence possibly realistic three-year timetable seems new. -- Patrick Moore

    [14] WHO ARE THE SEVEN MYSTERIOUS BOSNIAN MUSLIMS?

    Turning to a rather different military story, a scandal is emerging over a U.S. IFOR officer's decision earlier this month to hand over to Bosnian Serb police a group of seven uniformed and armed Muslims. The men surrendered to the Americans near Zvornik on the Bosnian border with Serbia shortly after IFOR heard explosions in the area, Reuters reported on 13 May. The officer said that he turned the men over to the Serb police because they appeared to be civilians despite their dress, because their weapons were in violation of the Dayton agreement, and because they were caught on Bosnian Serb territory. U.S. Maj. Gen. William Nash reportedly disagreed strongly with his subordinate's action and tried unsuccessfully to retake the men from the Serbs. Bosnian officials suggested that the men had escaped the fall of Srebrenica last summer and had been hiding out in caves ever since, but IFOR said they looked too well fed and well groomed to have been living rough. The Bosnian government says they are not its soldiers and has been playing down the incident, but AFP reported that Vice President Ganic has demanded that IFOR free the seven. The men nonetheless continued to be held in Zvornik until they were transferred to a Bijeljina prison, Onasa wrote on 18 May. -- Patrick Moore

    [15] RUMP YUGOSLAV ARMY DEBATES WAR CRIMINALS' FATE.

    Moving on to Serbia, the high command of the rump Yugoslav army recently debated the fate of three officers -- Gen. Mile Mrksic, Col. Veselin Sljivancanin and Capt. Miroslav Radic -- accused of and indicted in the 1991 massacre of at least 260 civilians near the Croatian city of Vukovar. On 10 May SRNA, citing Belgrade's independent Radio B 92, reported that one group in the command advocated that under no circumstances should the three be turned over to The Hague, allegedly because that group felt such a move would violate the rump Yugoslav constitution and have a highly detrimental effect on military morale. Another group, however, succeeded in having its view endorsed: namely, that the question of whether or not the accused should be turned over to The Hague be deferred to political authorities. The report also noted that those who advocated the political approach indicated that both the high command and all military personnel ought to come to terms with the possibility of the "worst possible case scenario," suggesting that the accused may be considering surrender. -- Stan Markotich

    [16] WAR CRIMES OFFICE TO OPEN IN BELGRADE.

    The rump Yugoslav government in fact on 15 May announced officially that an office representing the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia will be opened in Belgrade, AFP reported that same day. While outstanding details concerning the office's opening must be approved by both Belgrade and the court, Belgrade is on record as saying the office "will be able to receive anyone who wishes to make a declaration relating to war crimes" and that its chief officer will have diplomatic immunity. Rump Yugoslavia's "slowness" in cooperating with the Tribunal compelled its president, Antonio Cassese, as recently as last month to call for reinstituting sanctions against rump Yugoslavia, AFP added. -- Stan Markotich

    [17] THE BOSNIAN SERB LEADERSHIP IMBROGLIO: THE VIEW ON THE GROUND.

    "I did not imagine Karadzic could be so desperate as to make this kind of mistake," an official from the ruling Serbian Democratic Party (SDS) in Banja Luka told OMRI a day after Karadzic sacked his own Prime Minister Kasagic. The irreconcilable rift that had existed between Kasagic and Karadzic for some time became an accelerated conflict over the last two weeks after the British IFOR division moved to Banja Luka, thus making it impossible for Karadzic as an indicted war criminal to even think about visiting the largest and most important city in Republika Srpska . "If he [Karadzic] sat in Pale and talked on TV, he could comfortably wait for Carl Bildt and the international community to make mistakes. Now he thinks that he has an opportunity for open confrontation. This can harm the SDS in the elections," concluded a former follower of Karadzic.

    Miodrag Zivanovic, leader of the opposition Social Liberal Party (see above) said that Karadzic's sacking means "very fast polarization and that is good." Some skeptics thought this was just another trick to ensure the continuation of Karadzic's segregationist policy and blocking the implementation of the Dayton agreement. In language reminiscent of communist times, Karadzic stated: "I believe that Kasagic is a well-intentioned and honest man and that his mistakes were the consequence of inexperience in politics... [But] we cannot act on our own, in contravention of state institutions. Such actions only give our enemies hope and prolong our suffering." Since then, Kasagic disappeared from all government-controlled media. Banja Luka regime radio and TV broadcast several commentaries describing him as "a man on the international community's payroll."

    Kasagic fought back, proclaiming Karadzic's presidency "illegal." Bildt immediately showed his support of Kasagic. Bildt used words of unprecedented conviction saying he was "outraged" over the "illegal" step of Pale leadership. He swore that Kasagic will remain the prime minister in the eyes of the international community and that all contacts with him will continue. NATO's Solana came to Banja Luka explicitly to show his support for the ousted premier. The U.S., British, and French governments and 28 Bosnian Serb parliamentary deputies also voiced their support of Kasagic. Even Belgrade disapproved of the removal of a "moderate" politician. Milosevic agreed with Solana that the sacking was "too much." Milosevic met with three of Karadzic's closest allies -- Bosnian Serb Parliament Chairman Momcilo Krajisnik, Foreign Minister Aleksa Buha, and Vice President Nikola Koljevic. For a day or two, it seemed that Karadzic had finally gone one step too far.

    On 17 May, two days after sacking Kasagic, the RS government representatives did not attend scheduled meetings with international and federal officials in Sarajevo and the first rumors of a special session in Pale of RS parliamentary officials began to circulate. That evening, the Pale government held its own meeting and events started to move in a different direction. Krajisnik's intention to appoint as prime minister Gojko Klickovic, a fierce supporter of Karadzic, was leaked to the media. Nicknamed "the biggest mustache in the government," Klickovic early this year successfully led a special government commission in charge of organizing the evacuation of Serbs from five Sarajevo suburbs. Krajisnik was always Karadzic's closest ally. Together they have effective control over two important tools of power, the police forces and the state TV and radio network.

    Karadzic's next closest ally has been Bosnian Serb Vice President Biljana Plavsic, a hard-core nationalist. At the beginning of the war, Plavsic reportedly told a top UNHCR official that it is a "well-known fact" that the Muslims feed the bodies of murdered Serb children to the animals in the Sarajevo zoo. It came, moreover, as a surprise when, after being assured that the parliament will unanimously support Klickovic's appointment, Bildt went on Saturday to Pale to speak with Krajisnik. Bildt then retreated from his unequivocal support of Kasagic and said the full implementation of the Dayton peace agreement "is not primarily a question of personalities, it is a question of policy lines." This was reminiscent of a crisis in the Sarajevo suburbs in February and March 1996, when Bildt tried to avoid open political confrontation by making deals with Krajisnik, which Klickovic then immediately carried out. As a result, more than 60,000 Sarajevo Serbs left the suburbs. This time, in only one hour of debate with Krajisnik, all the strong statements Western governments had made were forgotten. Kasagic was out and Karadzic secured the prime minister's post for his devoted hard-liner.

    That night, SRNA reported that Karadzic decided to "hand over to Biljana Plavsic the power to deal with the international community." On Sunday, 19 May,

    Bildt tried to sell this as the outcome of intense diplomatic pressure, even hinting that this signaled Karadzic was on his way to The Hague. International media speculated that within 24 hours Karadzic would step down and issue a written resignation. However, the Sunday evening news on Pale TV gave a very different impression. Krajisnik denounced speculations that Karadzic would resign as "another trick aimed at trying to impose pressure on the RS." SRNA quoted an anonymous source "near to the leadership of our country" as saying, "if this pressure continues, we will move toward organizing a very quick referendum to show the real will of the people." SRNA reported that parliament's unanimous vote to support Klickovic represented the defeat of Bildt and NATO and that the West is afraid of "the unbelievable growth of popular support" for Karadzic. The TV news broadcast ended with a statement from two international law professors from Athens, who described the Hague tribunal as "illegal interference into the internal affairs of a sovereign country." Whatever developments the next few weeks bring, Karadzic's policy line is secured. -- Jan Urban in Sarajevo

    Compiled by Patrick Moore


    This material was reprinted with permission of the Open Media Research Institute, a nonprofit organization with research offices in Prague, Czech Republic.
    For more information on OMRI publications please write to info@omri.cz.


    Open Media Research Institute: Pursuing Balkan Peace Directory - Previous Article - Next Article
    Back to Top
    Copyright © 1995-2023 HR-Net (Hellenic Resources Network). An HRI Project.
    All Rights Reserved.

    HTML by the HR-Net Group / Hellenic Resources Institute, Inc.
    pbp2html v1.01 run on Tuesday, 28 May 1996 - 23:16:46