Read the Convention Concerning the Exchange of Greek and Turkish Populations (30 January 1923) Read the Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (24 July 1923) Read the Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (24 July 1923)
HR-Net - Hellenic Resources Network Compact version
Today's Suggestion
Read The "Macedonian Question" (by Maria Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou)
HomeAbout HR-NetNewsWeb SitesDocumentsOnline HelpUsage InformationContact us
Thursday, 28 March 2024
 
News
  Latest News (All)
     From Greece
     From Cyprus
     From Europe
     From Balkans
     From Turkey
     From USA
  Announcements
  World Press
  News Archives
Web Sites
  Hosted
  Mirrored
  Interesting Nodes
Documents
  Special Topics
  Treaties, Conventions
  Constitutions
  U.S. Agencies
  Cyprus Problem
  Other
Services
  Personal NewsPaper
  Greek Fonts
  Tools
  F.A.Q.
 

U.S. Department of State Daily Press Briefing #155, 97-10-28

U.S. State Department: Daily Press Briefings Directory - Previous Article - Next Article

From: The Department of State Foreign Affairs Network (DOSFAN) at <http://www.state.gov>


300

U.S. Department of State
Daily Press Briefing

I N D E X

Tuesday, October 28, 1997

Briefer: James P. Rubin

DEPARTMENT
1		Names of American Religious Leaders Invited to China

COLOMBIA 1 Alleged Link of Presidential Candidate Serpa to Drug Traffickers

CHINA 1-2 Definition of US-China Strategic Cooperation 2-3 Possible Agreement on Nuclear Non-proliferation Cooperation

BOSNIAN FEDERATION 3-4 Train and Equip Shipment Delivered to Ploce

HAITI 4 Sen. Helms' Letter to Secretary Albright on US Military Presence in Haiti


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DAILY PRESS BRIEFING

DPB #155

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1997, 1:50 P.M.

(ON THE RECORD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)

MR. RUBIN: Thanks. Just to give you the names again in case they were read too quickly, Don Argue the President of the National Association of Evangelicals.

QUESTION: How do you spell it?

MR. RUBIN: Argue, just the way we do every day. The Most Reverend Thomas McCarrick, M-c-C-A-R-R-I-C-K, the Catholic Archbishop of Newark; and, Rabbi Arthur Schneier, S-C-H-N-E-I-E-R, President of the Appeal of Conscience Foundation.

If there are other questions, I am here to take them; otherwise, we can adjourn. Yes.

QUESTION: The Colombian presidential candidate, Horacio Serpa challenged, in a letter today, the US to present the evidence that he is involved with drug trafficking. What is your reaction to that, and does the Secretary plan to present such evidence any time soon?

MR. RUBIN: Well, this all presumes that the United States officially made such a charge, and I specifically said yesterday that we were watching this issue very carefully and didn't make such a charge.

QUESTION: I asked Secretary Albright on strategic cooperation, what are the potentials? What are the limits of strategic cooperation with China? What does the term mean?

MR. RUBIN: Well, I think what it means is that the United States and China are large powers. The United States has global interests and the Chinese have increasing influence around the world as a result of the size of their economy and their position in East Asia. If you look at things like oil supplies in the Persian Gulf; if you look at issues like the environment where you are talking about China's critical role in coming to some agreement on climate change; if you talk about the drug trafficking in the area of that part of the world where there has been evidence of traffickers coming in and out and using China occasionally to export drugs, they have worked with us on that. We need to work with them more.

So if you look at these so-called trans-national threats - proliferation, drugs, terrorism, financial crime, corruption - these are the kind of threats that are very hard to grasp in the same way that we used to grasp threats in the Cold War. But they are very important to the well-being of the American people; and a relationship with China in which we are working together to solve those problems is, therefore, in the national interest of the United States.

I could go on. The Middle East peace process is something the Secretary and Foreign Minister Qian Qichen have begun to discuss in their bilateral meetings. The Chinese have interests there. So as a major power, a growing power, their role is increasingly important. They are a permanent member of the Security Council and, to the extent we want to get business done in the Security Council, they play a key role. I don't think anyone should soon forget the Chinese non-opposition to the Gulf War resolution and their support since then for sanctions on Iraq and the fact that Iraq must comply with the UN because of the danger that Iraq poses to the region. That is a strategic issue for the United States and China to continue to discuss.

Finally, just one final point, the subject of Iran has come up and the United States, Secretary Albright and others, have made clear to the Chinese that we see dangers emanating from Iran, and we believe that their acquisition of various weapons as a problem, and we have explained why we think that is a problem. The Chinese have indicated they are going to take our concern very seriously in this area, and so that is another area where you might call it strategic cooperation.

QUESTION: But strategic usually refers to, dealing with dangers from countries or specific disputes. How can you do this in Asia, when the Chinese have so much of a different stance than the United States does on some key issues -- for example, the US relationship with Japan and the US relationship with Taiwan?

MR. RUBIN: Well, again, as the Secretary pointed out, there are going to be areas of agreement and there are going to be areas of disagreement in our relation with the Chinese. The hope is to increase the areas of agreement. I think it is very much a strategic issue to obtain Chinese cooperation in the fight against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. There is no priority more important to the Secretary and the administration than preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction. Without Chinese cooperation, that objective would be very hard-pressed to be met and, therefore, that's a strategic issue.

That doesn't mean we are going to agree on everything. I think we have made clear to the Chinese that the specific US-Japan defense guidelines modernization was not directed at them, and we have seen less concern expressed as a result of the explanations we have made.

QUESTION: Speaking of non-proliferation, do you expect tomorrow that an agreement will be signed at the White House that would allow US firms to sell nuclear power technology to China?

MR. RUBIN: Well, let me turn the question around. If any agreement is signed tomorrow, it would be an agreement that would be the result of clear and unequivocal assurances from the Chinese Government that they will not be assisting non-nuclear weapon states to get nuclear weapons. If such an agreement were to be signed, it is about stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, obtaining new and clear and unequivocal and credible assurances to make sure that China does not participate in the spread of nuclear weapons.

The Secretary said that she was hopeful that that agreement would be able to be signed, but it will depend on final details that need to be worked out, and the President has to make a decision about that. But, again, there has been a focus on what the Chinese get from this agreement, and that is access to nuclear energy technology. I emphasize the word "energy." But what we are talking about here is an agreement that would move us one step closer in our fight to stop the spread of nuclear weapons.

QUESTION: Do you see anything as blocking such an agreement right now? Would you see anything imminent --

MR. RUBIN: I'm really not going to be able to move the so-called ball down the field any further than we have. We are hopeful; there are details still to be worked out. The President has to make a decision about this. The Chinese President is scheduled to arrive later this afternoon. The Secretary will be having a meeting with him later this afternoon and then, obviously, the full-blown agenda for tomorrow where this subject will come up. But as the Secretary said, we are hopeful.

QUESTION: Coming back to the issue of strategic cooperation on nuclear issues, I mean, at the moment it seems like there is a standoff, I mean, and there has been one, and the Chinese are the ones who have been, if anybody, violating or have been accused of violating the principles of non- proliferation. So how can you go from this position of, maybe not confrontation but certainly strong public disagreement to cooperation overnight? It just seems rather fast.

MR. RUBIN: Well, Roy, I would dispute the premise of your question. If you look over the last six years - I will use the number today, rather than five years - what you have seen is a China that was outside all of the international regimes on non-proliferation move inside those regimes; and those regimes have consequences. They affect behavior -- whether it is chemical weapons, whether it is the comprehensive test ban, whether it is the non-proliferation treaty, whether it is the commitments they have made to us on the missile technology control regime. They were outside before; they are inside now. That involves major changes in their behavior that have taken place over a multi-year period.

So it is simply incorrect to assert that yesterday the Chinese were violating all sorts of agreements or spreading all sorts of weapons and today they are our partner. We have been working this government steadily and in a determined fashion over the last six years to obtain changes in Chinese practices and their policies on non-proliferation, and we believe we have succeeded.

And if we have received the assurances that we believe are necessary to meet this high standard envisaged in this law, then the President will be able to make a certification. But it will only be moving farther down a road of increased Chinese cooperation on non-proliferation that has been marked and different over the last several years. It is not been overnight; it's been over time.

QUESTION: Some of the weapons that were being held up that were to be delivered to the Bosnian Croat Federation Army have been delivered today. Is this all of the weapons? Have they all been released? Are there more to come?

MR. RUBIN: I will be posting a statement on that, but I can say the following. US military equipment destined for the Bosnian Federation Army arrived today aboard the US ship MV American Condor just outside the Croatian port of Ploce. The United States is donating this equipment under authority provided by the US Congress as part of the US-led Train and Equip Program. This shipment - here is the word - substantially completes the delivery of equipment promised by the United States to the Federation.

My understanding is that weather is preventing the unloading of that shipment, and it may unload tomorrow. There are a whole array of weaponry on that ship, and that will be apparent from the statement, including transport helicopters that are being delivered as well as 155-millimeter Howitzers, artillery simulators, a number of other armored personnel carrier equipment, spare parts -- a whole series of equipment that substantially completes the delivery of what we promised to the Federation as part of our Train and Equip Program.

QUESTION: So there is still a little bit more to go?

MR. RUBIN: Well, usually words like "substantially" are put in there for a reason. I wouldn't rule out that there are still a few odds and ends to go, but I think this is the bulk of it.

QUESTION: Senator Helms' office has publicized a rather lengthy letter that he has written to the Secretary on the subject of Haiti. He thinks that the US troops there are not just there to build roads and bridges, but have some kind of quasi-security role and thinks it's time for them to leave. Do you have any reaction to that?

MR. RUBIN: We have not seen that letter. Surprisingly, from time to time, letters get in your hands before they get in our hands. We have not seen that yet, but I can say that from the Secretary's visit to Haiti that she met with the troops that were there. She participated at the opening of a school that our troops had built there -- and I can assure you that school wasn't a secret training base for Haitian children; it was a school for Haitian children.

And so the mission that they are performing are engineering tasks. They often have these civilian benefits like schools and roads and other projects like that. It is her impression, the Secretary's impression, from talking to the soldiers there that they find these kind of missions very valuable because it helps them in their training, and obviously the Haitian Government finds it valuable to have help in this area.

So I have not heard any suggestion from her trip that we would want less rather than more. I think the feeling is that these visits by the engineering units are a benefit to the units and a benefit to Haiti.

QUESTION: Thank you, sir.

(The briefing concluded at 2:00 p.m.)


U.S. State Department: Daily Press Briefings Directory - Previous Article - Next Article
Back to Top
Copyright © 1995-2023 HR-Net (Hellenic Resources Network). An HRI Project.
All Rights Reserved.

HTML by the HR-Net Group / Hellenic Resources Institute, Inc.
std2html v1.01a run on Tuesday, 28 October 1997 - 23:18:31 UTC