Browse through our Interesting Nodes on Greek Politics Read the Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (24 July 1923) Read the Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (24 July 1923)
HR-Net - Hellenic Resources Network Compact version
Today's Suggestion
Read The "Macedonian Question" (by Maria Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou)
HomeAbout HR-NetNewsWeb SitesDocumentsOnline HelpUsage InformationContact us
Friday, 29 March 2024
 
News
  Latest News (All)
     From Greece
     From Cyprus
     From Europe
     From Balkans
     From Turkey
     From USA
  Announcements
  World Press
  News Archives
Web Sites
  Hosted
  Mirrored
  Interesting Nodes
Documents
  Special Topics
  Treaties, Conventions
  Constitutions
  U.S. Agencies
  Cyprus Problem
  Other
Services
  Personal NewsPaper
  Greek Fonts
  Tools
  F.A.Q.
 

U.S. Department of State Daily Press Briefing #184, 97-12-19

U.S. State Department: Daily Press Briefings Directory - Previous Article - Next Article

From: The Department of State Foreign Affairs Network (DOSFAN) at <http://www.state.gov>


523

U.S. Department of State
Daily Press Briefing

I N D E X

Friday, December 19, 1997

Briefer: James B. Foley

ANNOUNCEMENTS
1		Secretary Albright to deliver year-end summary speech in
		  January
1		Background briefing today on Middle East peace process
1		US congratulates Jamaica on holding of elections
1		Assistant Secretary Inderfurth discusses Afghanistan at
		  Russian MFA
2		No change in U.S. passports requirement for travel to
		  Mexico
2		Ninth anniversary of PanAm 103 bombing

MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS 2-3 US reaction to PriMin Netanyahu remarks re construction of settlements, Israeli sovereignty over West Bank

GEORGIA 3 Sentencing in Washington of Georgian diplomat Gheorge Makharadze

DEPARTMENT 3-4 U.S. policy on diplomatic immunity, responsibility of diplomats for criminal acts

IRAQ 4 Press tour of selected presidential sites in Iraq, UNSCOM denied access

SOUTH KOREA 4 US congratulates Kim Dae-Jung on election as ROK President 5 No expected effect on four-party talks with North Korea, China; ROK call for dialogue

SAUDI ARABIA 5 US welcomes Saudi initiative to meet travel needs of Hajj pilgrims from Libya, Iraq

RWANDA 5-6 Report of another attack on a refugee center; US concerns re potential genocide 6 Amb. David Scheffer report on number of victims killed in Mudende attack

BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA 6-7 US supports War Crimes Tribunal Chief Prosecutor Arbour's decision to release three detained indictees due to lack of evidence

JAPAN 7-8 Upcoming Okinawa referendum on construction of alternate helicopter facility for US forces

SINGAPORE / INDONESIA 8 Reports of American citizens killed in SilkAir crash

TURKEY 8 White House to address questions on Prime Minister Yilmaz Washington visit


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DAILY PRESS BRIEFING

DPB #184

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1997, 1:10 P.M.

(ON THE RECORD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED

MR. FOLEY: Welcome. I apologize for the delay. We had some technical difficulties. I have a number of announcements to make.

First, following the holidays, Secretary Albright will deliver a major address reflecting on her first year as Secretary of State. Her speech, which is tentatively scheduled to take place in the second week of January, will examine the critical foreign policy decisions of 1997, and she will also explain her vision of the future of US foreign policy. We're going to provide details as soon as they are finalized, shortly after the new year.

Secondly, we're going to have a senior administration official here at the podium at 2:30 p.m. this afternoon to give you a background briefing on the Secretary's meetings yesterday in Europe with Prime Minister Netanyahu and Chairman Arafat.

I have a few other announcements. We congratulate the people of Jamaica on the holding of national elections on December 18. Jamaica has a strong tradition of democratic government, but past elections have often been marred by violence and fraud. Regrettably, yesterday's elections gave rise to three deaths and to some allegations of malpractice.

Nevertheless, thanks to the efforts of the people of Jamaica, also to the efforts of domestic and international election observers, government officials, and the political parties and their leaders, the elections of 1997 were more orderly than those in recent Jamaican history. The United States Government looks forward to continuing to work with Prime Minister Patterson and the government of Jamaica.

Next, the Assistant Secretary of State for South Asian Affairs, Karl Inderfurth, met with his Russian counterparts in Moscow, December 18 and 19 -- yesterday and today -- to discuss South Asia, and particularly the situation in Afghanistan. The talks were conducted in a spirit of close cooperation, and explored ways in which the two sides could work together to create conditions for a political settlement that would bring peace and reconstruction to Afghanistan.

The discussions were conducted in the context of the support given by both the United States and Russia to the efforts of the United Nations and the secretary general's special envoy for Afghanistan, Ambassador Lakhdar Brahimi. The United States and Russia call on all Afghan parties to stop fighting and to begin serious negotiations.

I'm also going to post a statement concerning the use of American passports for travel to Mexico. Let me just state briefly the main item, which is that the Department of State has been receiving queries that, as a result of an alleged change in either US or Mexican requirements, US citizens will have to have a passport to enter Mexico. These reports are false. We would like to affirm that the entry requirements for US citizens going to Mexico are unchanged.

And finally, on a more somber note, this weekend marks the ninth anniversary of one of the worst terrorist attacks in the history of our country. On December 21, 1988, a bomb destroyed Pan American Flight 103, killing 259 passengers and 11 residents on the ground in the town of Lockerbie, Scotland. Altogether, the 270 victims represented nationals of 21 countries; 189 of them were citizens of the United States.

An exhaustive criminal investigation uncovered convincing evidence that two Libyan intelligence officials were responsible for placing the bomb that destroyed the aircraft and the lives of so many people. Both men face serious criminal charges in the United States and in Scotland. The international community has demanded that they be surrendered for trial. But they are still sheltered in Libya.

We have not forgotten the terrible crime committed that day nine years ago; and we shall not forget. We will continue to demand that the two men accused of this crime be held to answer so that the truth may be known. We pledge our continuing commitment to see that justice is done.

This Sunday, our thoughts will be with the family and friends of those who so needlessly died, as they gather at Arlington Cemetery, in Lockerbie, and elsewhere to remember their loved ones. We in the State Department, particularly, send our prayers to the families of our colleagues who were among the slain.

I'd like to take your questions.

QUESTION: Prime Minister Netanyahu said today that despite US calls for a time-out, he won't limit the building of Jewish settlements in the West Bank or Jerusalem. I don't know whether you saw those or not; but if you did, do you have a comment?

MR. FOLEY: I've not seen those comments. But our position on the matter of settlement activity is unchanged. We believe that such activity is unhelpful, particularly at this very sensitive moment in the peace negotiations. We've long urged all the parties to refrain from unilateral acts which make it difficult for the negotiations to progress and to prosper, and to avoid actions that tend to pre-judge final status or permanent status negotiations.

QUESTION: He also said, Netanyahu, that the West Bank is part of Israel, proper. That prompted some reaction from European officials. I was wondering if you --

MR. FOLEY: Well, again, I have not seen his comments. So it's hazardous, really, for me to comment on something that I can't officially attribute to the Prime Minister. But clearly, that is an area and a territory that we regard as subject to negotiations in the permanent status talks.

QUESTION: Do you have any reaction to the Makharadze sentencing?

MR. FOLEY: I just heard about it, in coming in, so I can't give you an official comment. But we believe it was a fair trial. The sentence seemed to us to have been also a fair one that reflected the nature of the crime involved.

I'm aware that the judge in the case took note, acknowledged the courageous decision by President Shevardnadze to waive the diplomatic immunity of the defendant. I believe, in that respect, that the harshest sentence was not imposed. It was clearly a serious sentence that he received, and we believe that justice has been done.

QUESTION: What do you think the message is from the court about diplomatic immunity?

MR. FOLEY: Well, I've just been briefed orally before coming in, so I'd rather leave, maybe, until next week an official comment, because your question is highly speculative.

I was informed, however, that the judge did take into consideration the fact that the government of Georgia had voluntarily determined to waive the diplomatic immunity, which, as you know, is a very unusual circumstance. In that respect, I believe he took that into account in his sentencing decision.

QUESTION: If I could follow just for a second, you know there are efforts underway on Capitol Hill to reform - if that's the right word for it - diplomatic immunity. How much is the State Department willing to support efforts to reform diplomatic immunity?

MR. FOLEY: Well, I don't think we've seen specific legislation that's been introduced. I think there's an effort underway in the Congress to encourage nations around the world, including the United States, in instances where diplomatic immunity is not waived, to commit to try diplomats in their own country when they return.

As you know, our practice is - in cases such as these - is to seek a waiver of diplomatic immunity. We do not believe that diplomatic immunity is in any way a license for foreign diplomats to commit crimes in our country. There have been cases where such waivers have been obtained, usually involving lesser violations, lesser crimes than what occurred in this case. There are very few. It's a very rare instance where crimes of this nature do take place. I believe there was on in the United States a number of years ago, involving a murder where diplomatic immunity was waived and the prosecution ensued.

But we'd have to take a look at that legislation. We're working with the Congress, I believe, on the idea. I'm not sure how far advanced it is, though.

QUESTION: Do you agree with that concept of bringing diplomats back to their home?

MR. FOLEY: Well, it's something that we'd have to look at very carefully, our legal experts here, and I think at the Justice Department. There are practical difficulties involved. For example, in a hypothetical case, where an American diplomat was brought home to this country and was charged with crimes overseas, there would be practical difficulties in pursuing a prosecution here that one could imagine, involving location of witnesses and the collection of evidence and items of that nature. So it's something that the legal experts, I think, in the government and also in Congress would have to work on.

QUESTION: What is the US reaction to reports that Iraqi palaces were opened to the press?

MR. FOLEY: I think it's a demonstration of rank hypocrisy on Iraq's part. It is of a piece, with the announcement three or four weeks ago, that Iraq was willing to invite delegations, foreign delegations, to visit presidential sites. What it demonstrates is that the Iraqi claims of sovereignty protecting UN access to those sites are hypocritical, because what's clear is that Iraq does not want UNSCOM to go to those sites to do its work. But it's willing to let reporters, foreign delegations to go there to visit what they claim to be sensitive and sovereign sites that ought to be off-limits.

It's very obvious that their problem is with UNSCOM, and it's UNSCOM they don't want to visit those sites, and that can only raise questions as to why they don't want UNSCOM to visit those sites. I think it's, again, of a piece of a pattern where the Iraqis take actions which only undermine their own case, the coherence of their arguments and the legitimacy of their case.

QUESTION: Do you have any comment on the result of South Korea's presidential election? And what kind of cooperation do you expect between the US Government and Mr. Kim Dae Jung, elected candidate as the next president of South Korea? Do you have any plan to invite him to Washington?

MR. FOLEY: Well, we certainly congratulate Mr. Kim Dae Jung on his victory in yesterday's election. Mr. Kim is well-known as a supporter of strong relations between the United States and Korea, and he has many friends here. So in answer to your first question, we certainly look forward to working with him in the future, and we expect to have an excellent, productive working relationship with him.

We also would like to congratulate the people of Korea, who once again have demonstrated their impressive commitment to the democratic process. This is the third free presidential election since the end of military rule, and the first to involve a transfer of power from one political party to another. So we think it's a very significant event that really consolidates once and for all the establishment of democracy in South Korea. We congratulate the people of South Korea on the elections.

In terms of a possible visit, I'd have to refer you to the White House, because, of course, it would involve presidential invitation.

QUESTION: Do you think it's going to do something for the four-party talks?

MR. FOLEY: We don't anticipate any change in South Korea's commitment to the four-party talks. I understand that in his comments following his victory last evening in Seoul, that Mr. Kim did, among other things, declare his support for the four-party talks forum. So we're very encouraged by that.

QUESTION: -- during the presidential election, Kim Dae Jung said over and over again that he is interested in direct dialogue with the North Koreans more than the four-party talks. So other than he supported the four-party talks yesterday, do you have any anxiety of the future of the four-party talks because of his attitude toward the presidential campaign?

MR. FOLEY: That's a good question. We have no anxiety whatsoever. On the one hand, he confirmed his support for the four-party talks. We look forward to their continuation in the next couple of months, after the new year.

But in terms of his long-standing call for dialogue between the North and South, and the development of relations between the two countries, we support that and we think that it can only help to reinforce prospects for success within the four-party talks forum.

QUESTION: Can we go back to Iraq for a second?

MR. FOLEY: Sure.

QUESTION: Saudi Arabia has announced that they plan to arrange for transport for pilgrims from Iraq and Libya to Mecca for the upcoming Hajj. Is there any US reaction to that?

MR. FOLEY: Yes, the Saudi Arabian Government announced this on December 16 - that the government will take measures and request appropriate UN approval to ensure that all Libyan and Iraqi pilgrims are able to meet their Hajj obligations. The US very much welcomes this important Saudi initiative. The United States has always supported allowing Libyan and Iraqi pilgrims to meet their religious obligations.

In the past, the Libyan and Iraqi regimes have made cynical political use of the Hajj, by dispatching flights in defiance of UN Security Council resolutions. We believe that this year, the Saudi initiative will address fully the needs of all Libyan and Iraqi pilgrims. We understand that third country aircraft will be used, and UN procedures respected.

In other words, unauthorized flights would therefore be unnecessary and unjustified. We expect the Iraqi and Libyan regimes to respect the will of the international community in this regard.

QUESTION: On Rwanda, have you seen the latest reports about the violence?

MR. FOLEY: I have not - reports this morning, Carol, or today?

QUESTION: Yes, about another attack on a refugee center.

MR. FOLEY: I don't have the document before me, but you would have seen the very sobering statement that our spokesman, Jamie Rubin, issued the other day in Europe, following the report that Ambassador Scheffer made to Secretary Albright on his visit to the site of the latest massacre. And we are indeed deeply concerned about the prospect of renewed genocide in Rwanda, and are consulting with the United Nations Security Council, with the Rwandan Government and with countries in the region. We are considering diplomatic and other steps that we will take to deal with what is clearly a deteriorating security situation.

QUESTION: Can I follow up on that?

MR. FOLEY: Sure.

QUESTION: David Scheffer, in his report, talked about 327 people that were killed in the Mudende attack, but apparently there is some consternation around that figure, because some witnesses put it three, four, five times greater.

MR. FOLEY: Well, I've read the report that he gave to the Secretary, and he conducted a very thorough and serious investigation. He was not alone; he was accompanied by other experts and officials. I have to believe that it's a credible report, and the Secretary was deeply moved by his report. As I indicated, we're consulting with our allies on the Security Council to see what we can do about the current situation, which is clearly deteriorating.

As to the specific numbers, whether it was - I believe the number in his report was higher than what the original press reports had indicated. So I'm not sure that it is an issue, but I'd be happy to talk to Ambassador Scheffer, though, to ask him about the specific number.

QUESTION: Do you have any comment on the International Tribunal releasing - I guess it's three Bosnian Croat suspects?

MR. FOLEY: Yes. The United States supports the prosecutor's decision to withdraw these indictments after they were reviewed. This decision is in accord with the highest duty of any prosecutor, which is to see that justice is done.

We would also point out that this development shows that these indictees did the right thing by surrendering voluntarily on October 6. It shows, in particular, that the process at the Tribunal is fair and impartial. This example illustrates to all sides each case is looked at individually. No one is prejudged when they arrive in The Hague.

Today's action by the Tribunal also sends a strong signal that other indictees should surrender voluntarily now. They, too, will get fair treatment in The Hague.

No other questions?

QUESTION: There was a lack of evidence; is that your understanding?

MR. FOLEY: That's my understanding. I'd have to refer you to the Tribunal for details on that. But the legal standards for bringing an indictment and for going to trial are different. The prosecutor must review evidence against any indictee before deciding to bring an indictment and before going to trial. So the standards may be different.

QUESTION: Are you concerned that there may not be enough evidence against a lot of these other suspects; that maybe they have nothing to fear at all by turning themselves in?

MR. FOLEY: Well, there have been, I think, upwards of 22 indictees in The Hague. And there have only been three now, as of today, who have been released.

What we're looking for is not to look at the number who are there, but the number who belong there. We've got some ways to go so that all indicted detainees are in The Hague.

What this development today demonstrates is that they'll get a fair hearing. I think, clearly, it must be a complicated situation that the Tribunal has to deal with, in compiling evidence and witness testimony. But they've been at work on this for quite some time, and they believe that they have solid cases. That's why indictments are issued.

But the standard for prosecution, clearly, is higher. I'd have to refer you, though, to their assessment of how they're doing with their other cases. But we want the emphasis to be on those who are not yet in The Hague. They need to go there. It's obviously a fair Tribunal. Those who are indicted and who loudly proclaim their innocence ought to test their innocence in what is clearly a fair Tribunal.

QUESTION: On Sunday in Okinawa, Japan, voters are going to be participating in a referendum on whether or not to build a new heli-port off of Nago, Okinawa. Depending on the outcome, what do you think - will it have an effect on US-Japan relations?

MR. FOLEY: Well, let me give a little of the background to this vote. On the Special Action Committee on Okinawa final report, the governments of the United States and Japan agreed to the return of Marine Corps air station Futenma, after adequate replacement facilities were completed and operational.

We remain committed to the implementation of this SACO final report, as it's called. The final report stated that a replacement facility for Futenma air station must maintain that air field's critical operational functions and capabilities. We believe a sea-based facility, such as is proposed in this referendum, could meet these criteria.

We'll be watching the outcome of the vote, but we believe this is a domestic matter within Japan. So I really wouldn't want to comment further. This is one possible solution to the relocation question to which we've committed. But it's an issue that will be with us, regardless of the outcome of the referendum.

QUESTION: Anything on Americans who may have been aboard the plane that crashed?

MR. FOLEY: We have only press reports that indicate that there may have been several American citizens who were on board; but we're unable to confirm that. Our embassies both in Jakarta and in Singapore are working intensively on this right now.

QUESTION: The Turkish Prime Minister is here in Washington --

MR. FOLEY: And I can't really comment on it while he's over at the White House.

QUESTION: Nothing at all?

MR. FOLEY: The White House will be in a position to talk about the visit maybe later this afternoon.

Thank you.

QUESTION: Thank you.

(The briefing concluded at 1:45 P.M.)


U.S. State Department: Daily Press Briefings Directory - Previous Article - Next Article
Back to Top
Copyright © 1995-2023 HR-Net (Hellenic Resources Network). An HRI Project.
All Rights Reserved.

HTML by the HR-Net Group / Hellenic Resources Institute, Inc.
std2html v1.01b run on Saturday, 20 December 1997 - 2:10:36 UTC