Browse through our Interesting Nodes on the Balkan Peninsula Read the Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (24 July 1923) Read the Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (24 July 1923)
HR-Net - Hellenic Resources Network Compact version
Today's Suggestion
Read The "Macedonian Question" (by Maria Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou)
HomeAbout HR-NetNewsWeb SitesDocumentsOnline HelpUsage InformationContact us
Friday, 29 March 2024
 
News
  Latest News (All)
     From Greece
     From Cyprus
     From Europe
     From Balkans
     From Turkey
     From USA
  Announcements
  World Press
  News Archives
Web Sites
  Hosted
  Mirrored
  Interesting Nodes
Documents
  Special Topics
  Treaties, Conventions
  Constitutions
  U.S. Agencies
  Cyprus Problem
  Other
Services
  Personal NewsPaper
  Greek Fonts
  Tools
  F.A.Q.
 

U.S. Department of State Daily Press Briefing #120, 98-11-02

U.S. State Department: Daily Press Briefings Directory - Previous Article - Next Article

From: The Department of State Foreign Affairs Network (DOSFAN) at <http://www.state.gov>


749

U.S. Department of State
Daily Press Briefing

I N D E X

Monday, November 2, 1998

Briefer: JAMES P. RUBIN

IRAQ
1		US regards announcement as a very serious matter; UN
		  Security Council condemned it.
1		All options remain on the table; Secretary has contacted
		  other UNSC foreign ministers.
2,3		UNSC to meet informally today, tomorrow, on this flagrant
		  violation.
4		Based on announcement, postures of UNSCOM and IAEA missions
		  have been adjusted.
4		Saddam Hussein has defied the will of the international
		  community since August.
5		US has no present evidence that Iraq is reconstituting its
		  weapons of mass destruction.
5		UN's "oil-for-food" program is continuing, unaffected by
		  this latest crisis.
6		US believes it needs no further UNSC authority to act, if
		  necessary.

MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS 7,8 Secretary Albright spoke to PM Netanyahu a short time ago. 7,8 US does not think Wye schedule is going to be delayed. 9 Hamas and Hezbollah have made outrageous, condemnable statements. 9 US thinks Chairman Arafat's determination to go forward is courageous. 10 US seeks further information on housing plans on Israeli side. 10 Both sides must understand that actions, statements can undermine confidence. 11 Final status negotiations are expected to begin this week. 12 From US perspective, Wye agreement enters into force today.

BOSNIA 14 Cody Shearer did not engage in any negotiation on behalf of the US Government at any time.

RUSSIA 14 US has no evidence President Yeltsin has taken any steps to change constitution. 14 Prime Minister Primakov has full authority to move forward on economic issues. 14,15 US wishes President Yeltsin a speedy recovery from his health problems. 15 A US team is in Russia, discussing size, conditions of possible US food assistance.

CENTRAL AMERICA 15 Disasters declared in several countries; a monitoring group has been established here. 15 First airlifts of US supplies reached Honduras October 31, second on November 1..

FRY/KOSOVO 16 Assistant Secretary Julia Taft judged humanitarian situation in Kosovo to have improved. 16 Return of internally displaced persons has accelerated. Food convoys have been getting in. 16 Over 200 verifiers are in Kosovo now. 16 On October 30, NATO approved activation order for the air verification regime. 16,17 Some KLA have moved into areas vacated by Serb police. 17 Humanitarian situation has greatly eased; problems remain, but trends are in right direction. 17 We've made clear to KLA not to initiate hostilities. 17 There have been no significant violations of the cease-fire.

MALAYSIA 18 Trial of Anwar Ibrahim should be fair and open; US will monitor proceedings. 18-19 Entrance to courtroom was denied to US diplomatic observer, who was second in line.


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DAILY PRESS BRIEFING

DPB #120

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1998 12:45 P.M.

(ON THE RECORD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)

MR. RUBIN: Greetings. Welcome to the State Department briefing here on Monday. I have no announcements for you. So let me go right to your questions. Sid Balman, from the United Press International.

QUESTION: Well, why don't we start with Iraq? What about you choosing the time and place for confrontation?

MR. RUBIN: Let me bring you up to date on the facts first and then address the question directly. My podium seems a little lower here, but we'll work on that.

Over the weekend Iraq announced it would prevent the UN Special Commission from conducting any further activities, including monitoring inside Iraq. The decision does not appear to pertain to monitoring of designated sites by the International Atomic Energy Agency, nor has Iraq expressed an intent to expel UNSCOM personnel. The Council issued a statement unanimously condemning the decision over the weekend, and we expect them be discussing the matter in informal discussions at the bilateral and multilateral level today and tomorrow.

A normal complement of roughly 120 inspectors remains in Iraq. There are no plans to withdraw UNSCOM inspectors at this point. We understand that one technical team has gone out to maintain monitoring equipment and IAEA teams have visited sites for a second consecutive day. With respect to your question on the use of force, let me say that we regard this as a very serious matter. Iraq has confronted the international community with an escalation by refusing to cooperate. It flies in the face of the offer the Council made on Friday to allow for a comprehensive review if, and only if, Iraq returns into compliance. This flouting of the Security Council and the international community and the world was unanimously condemned, and I think the Council acted with great speed and great clarity in making clear that this is a flagrant violation of the Security Council's decisions.

The Secretary is reviewing all options with the President. All options remain on the table and all options means all options. With respect to next steps, let me say the Secretary has been in consultation with some of her colleagues over the weekend and today. I believe she has spoken this morning with Foreign Minister Ivanov of Russia; yesterday with Foreign Minister Vedrine of France; and yesterday with Foreign Minister Cook, UN Secretary General Kofi

Annan and Foreign Minister Lampreia of Brazil. So, we are in an intensive consultative mode consulting about Iraq's failure to comply with previous resolutions and its escalation of this confrontation by its most recent decisions. That's where we are as far as the use of force.

I think I have addressed it as best as I can.

QUESTION: There was a suggestion--I forget by who--over the weekend that this was really something for Kofi Annan to deal with since after all it was sort of his agreement. Is that a torch you all care to--

MR. RUBIN_: Well, obviously we would be pleased if Saddam Hussein were to respond to such an entreaty by the Secretary General but it looks like it is a little bit beyond that at this time. Right now we are in a situation where the Council is going to be meeting today informally in bilateral discussions--and tomorrow, and we understand that some delegations are considering a resolution which we would be happy to take a look at. So, I think the next step is clearly for the Council to make clear that this is unacceptable and that this decision is in flagrant violation of the requirements of the Security Council. Secretary Albright is going to be consulting with her colleagues about that.

Furthermore, I think it is also clear that Saddam Hussein has tried and failed to divide the international community. Even Saddam Hussein's erstwhile friends are left speechless in trying to defend the indefensible. So, that is where we are and its a matter that is being dealt with at the White House today and Secretary Albright is going to be consulting with her colleagues in addition to the ones she has already consulted with.

QUESTION: I think it was Secretary Cohen who said, you know, this violates the agreement--Kofi Annan's?

MR. RUBIN: It certainly does.

QUESTION: His reputation is on--he's crossed.

MR. RUBIN: I know.

QUESTION: You agree he has crossed Kofi Annan, hasn't he?

MR. RUBIN: Absolutely.

QUESTION: Jamie, this has come up so many, many times. You know, like you couldn't read Milosevic's mind. And I don't know that anybody can read Saddam Hussein's mind.

MR. RUBIN: Or want to.

QUESTION: Well, I don't know you know the phrase "cry wolf" comes to mind. Not that I am saying you folks are crying wolf, but he has been threatened so many times. How do you drive home that at this time, you know, you folks really mean it? What about the old unilateral option? Apparently, you don't think that is necessary that whatever will be done will be done in an allied way?

MR. RUBIN: When I said that all options remain open that includes the option that you mentioned. So all options means all options. And all options are on the table.

With respect to bringing this home to Saddam Hussein, I think he severely miscalculated. In Secretary Albright's conversations with her colleagues her impression was that this was one of the more uniform responses from colleagues that she consulted with in saying that Iraq's action was inexplicable and unacceptable. So, I think they may have imagined that there would be more support than there is. But as I said even their erstwhile friends are left speechless in trying to defend the indefensible.

QUESTION: Did anybody--the Russians, particularly--suggest or the French that maybe they will run their own--make their own diplomatic effort.

MR. RUBIN: No--not so far.

QUESTION: There's no awareness of that.

QUESTION: Can we assume that since she spoke with Vedrine and Ivanov and you're now--you're saying that in her consultations, the uniform response was that Iraq's actions are inexplicable and unacceptable?

MR. RUBIN: Right.

QUESTION: Can we make the leap that that is what the Russians and the French said to her, as well?

MR. RUBIN: Again, I would not be in a position to comment on any specific conversation with a specific foreign minister. I have given you the list of people she has talked to. I have given you a general flavor as to what the responses were.

QUESTION: Does the still delicate state of the Middle East peace process and the aftermath of Wye--

MR. RUBIN_: We are done with Iraq?

QUESTION: No, no. It bears on that.

MR. RUBIN: I see. This was a lead-in.

QUESTION: Does this complicate--does it complicate your--

MR. RUBIN_: On the contrary?

QUESTION: All right, I have another Iraq. But other people have questions.

MR. RUBIN: Yes.

QUESTION: Did you see any gap between what the Iraqi's are saying in public and what they are enforcing on the ground in respect to the UN inspections? And if so, how do you interpret that?

MR. RUBIN: Well, as I indicated at the outset that there were one of the cameras was allowed to be serviced by UNSCOM and IAEA people were allowed to visit two locations, I believe. Let me check that precisely. IAEA teams have visited sites for a second consecutive day, both of which are consistent with what they have said publicly.

As I indicated at the outset, what they have said publicly is that they would prevent the UN Special Commission from conducting any further activities, including monitoring inside Iraq. It does not appear to pertain to monitoring of designated sites by the IAEA, nor has Iraq expressed an intent to expel UNSCOM personnel. With the one exception of the adjustment of that one camera, they have made clear that they are not going to cooperate and UNSCOM has not sent its people home but they have not been expelled either.

QUESTION: Can I ask that another way around? Just to find out if the Iraqis have one anything which would show that they are intending to carry out this threat? I mean, they've spoken about what they're going to do.

MR. RUBIN: Right.

QUESTION: But has anything happened? Any sort of confrontation happened that would suggest--

MR. RUBIN_: I'm not aware of one. I think the posture of the IAEA and UNSCOM has been adjusted based on this announcement. When Saddam Hussein's Revolutionary Command Council and Saddam Hussein himself make these kind of statements, there are certain consequences. In a dictatorship like Iraq, one has every reason to assume that if UNSCOM inspectors try to act in such a way to contravene the statements of Iraq, that it wouldn't be allowed. So, I will have to check with UNSCOM to see what they've tested. But let's be clear, starting in August, and now with its escalation today, Saddam Hussein is defying the will of the international community, and the international community is making increasingly clear that these actions--especially this escalatory action is unacceptable.

QUESTION: You've mentioned that Saddam has defied the will now since August. How long--at what point does sort of this continuing intransigence affect his ability to reconstitute any weapons of mass destruction programs that he may have or have had?

MR. RUBIN: If we determined that he is reconstituting his weapons of mass destruction programs, we would act. We have no evidence of that at the present time. But let me be clear. This is a very serious matter. We're handling it seriously, and we're acting with all deliberate speed.

QUESTION: What do you mean by act?

MR. RUBIN: I don't want to be more specific than that.

QUESTION: Is it possible to determine if he's reconstituting his weapons of mass destruction without having inspectors on site able--going through the various buildings and locations?

MR. RUBIN: Yes, with a reasonable degree of confidence.

QUESTION: Is the Food For Peace Program (sic) continuing normally?

MR. RUBIN: Oil For Food.

QUESTION: Oil For Food, whatever.

MR. RUBIN: Food For Peace is somewhere else.

QUESTION: Is that continuing normally.

MR. RUBIN: Sorry, the commentary flowing from your question made me unable to hear the last--

QUESTION_: Sorry. Seeds of Peace.

MR. RUBIN: --part of the question. Okay.

QUESTION: Oil For Peace.

MR. RUBIN: Can we now go back to the question? Thank you.

QUESTION: Is the program that feeds the Iraqis--continuing?

MR. RUBIN: Yes, it's continuing. This has no effect on that. Let's bear in mind the U.S. and the British and others set up this program precisely because we have every reason to believe Iraq is not going to comply with the UN Security Council resolutions because we care about the Iraqi people. So billions of dollars of food and medicine have gone to the Iraqi people as a result of a program started by the United States and pushed by the United States, and that is irrespective of his noncompliance on the weapons of mass destruction side.

QUESTION: Can you cite anything--or what evidence do you have, or we'll even take your word for it, if she got it on the phone, that the Arab countries, some of whom you may need militarily, share the despair or the attitude of the U.S. and the British?

MR. RUBIN: Well, the reports that we're receiving are that there is unanimity in the world that this is unacceptable. In the Arab world it's very clear to us from some of our key friends there that they regard this as totally unacceptable. I wouldn't purport to speak for each one of them. But generally speaking, the general reaction has been that this is unacceptable.

QUESTION: Do they find it so unacceptable they would cooperate in military operations?

MR. RUBIN: That's getting too far ahead of the game for me to address.

QUESTION: You said that some delegations to the United Nations were preparing resolutions. Why is the United States not doing that? Why are you not taking the lead on this?

MR. RUBIN: Well, that's a technical detail. For a variety of reasons, we often let others prepare a resolution. As you know, we don't believe we need authority from the Security Council to act any further. Let me rephrase that for clarity. We don't believe we need any further authority to act. Others may have a different view.

QUESTION: Would you urge the Security Council to adopt a new goal, which is perhaps the old goal, of complete compliance and access to all sites in Iraq instead of merely restoring the monitoring?

MR. RUBIN: We will seek--and the Security Council resolutions, we hope, will make clear that Iraq doesn't get to decide where and when and with whom UNSCOM and the UN does its inspections. It's up to the UN experts to decide where to go when to go and with whom to go. That should be very clear from our past positions. We would certainly be supportive of any effort to further clarify that, but I don't think there's a lot of doubt about it.

QUESTION: But, Jamie, then long-term monitoring and IAEA inspections would not satisfy the United States?

MR. RUBIN: We've said since August that it's unsatisfactory, the situation in which the inspections weren't permitted. So that's--there's nothing new about that.

QUESTION: So there wouldn't be an alternative that might?

MR. RUBIN: There's nothing new about that position. It's been our position since August--since the beginning of UNSCOM.

QUESTION: I know. But now this--seems to be more noise about the long--you say the long-term monitor--and the cameras are still on and they're still allowing the IAEA to come in. This looks like that may be where it's--

MR. RUBIN_: You're looking for me to presage choices. I'm not going to do that. All of them are unacceptable. I have made certain statements about what would happen if there were reconstitution. But with respect to monitoring, inspections, challenge inspections of normal sites, challenge inspections of sensitive sites, challenge inspections of presidential sites, our position remains unchanged: UNSCOM should be able to go where it needs to go to do its job.

QUESTION: Middle East?

MR. RUBIN: Well, one more on this.

QUESTION: Jamie, how would you respond to reports out of Baghdad today that officials are saying that Iraq can withstand a U.S. attack, and then the vice president was quoted as saying that, you know, they're not afraid of these threats from the U.S. because we've been making them for the past eight years?

MR. RUBIN: I think the Iraqi history includes statements saying that they were going to win the Gulf War. So we don't take those very seriously.

QUESTION: How does the State Department feel about the Wye schedule being thrown off? And there was an American delegation due to go, are they still going? Are they delayed simply?

MR. RUBIN: Secretary Albright spoke to Prime Minister Netanyahu in the last couple of hours. We do not think the schedule is going to be thrown off. The legal-political process is one the Israelis are going to need to work through, including a cabinet vote, and including a vote in the Knesset. As a result of her phone call with Prime Minister Netanyahu, she believes the Israeli leader is committed to moving forward with the Wye agreement as signed and whatever technical legal-political issues arise, we expect and anticipate that each side will have the necessary time to complete its responsibilities pursuant to the time line of the Wye agreement. What was your second question?

QUESTION: The group--the delegation?

MR. RUBIN: Ambassador Ross and his deputy, Aaron Miller, I would expect to have a revolving presence in the Middle East during the course of implementation. I believe Ambassador Ross is expected to leave this week. The exact date may be as early as tomorrow, it hasn't been finally decided.

QUESTION: There was a notion last Friday that Indyk would be in the group and that he would, at some point, go to Damascus and test those waters out.

MR. RUBIN: I'll have to check with Assistant Secretary Indyk with respect to his schedule.

QUESTION: Okay.

MR. RUBIN: Tom.

QUESTION: New subject.

QUESTION: Assistant Secretary Indyk is not now planning to go with this group?

MR. RUBIN: I said I was going to check with his schedule.

QUESTION: Okay, but it seems like there has been--I mean, it would seem pretty--seemed fairly firm to an observer that it was pretty well set.

MR. RUBIN: I just don't know his schedule. I'll have to get it for you.

QUESTION: You know, on the schedule I'm a little--I mean, you mean in substance it's not going to be thrown off, I take it.

MR. RUBIN: I haven't heard of any substantive change in plan with respect to our consultations with countries in the region.

QUESTION: No, I don't--

MR. RUBIN_: I just don't have his schedule.

QUESTION: No, I don't mean the Ross thing. I'm talking about the larger picture of following through on Wye. The commitment made--you say the commitment is there. Nobody is questioning that the commitment has changed. It's just things have happened on the ground that may delay the implementation. You know, you can see that.

MR. RUBIN: Well, what?

QUESTION: Threats against Arafat's life, for instance?

MR. RUBIN: No, we don't see that.

QUESTION: Knesset approval?

MR. RUBIN: I said that Secretary Albright had a discussion with Prime Minister Netanyahu about the political-legal process the Israelis need to go through, including a vote in the cabinet and a vote in the Knesset. As a result of those conversations, we have no reason to think that the schedule laid out in the Wye memorandum need be delayed.

QUESTION: Have you heard any new threats, for instance, from Hezbollah? Against Arafat?

MR. RUBIN: I've seen a lot of threats against--from Hezbollah and Hamas--reports of such threats. Let me say very clearly, I think that the enemies of peace, the extremists, the killers of children and women and innocents will continue to fight the process of peace that courageous leaders from the Palestinian side and the Israeli side are pursuing. We have seen extremists on both sides say things with respect to Hamas and Hezbollah. They have obviously made some outrageous and condemnable statements. We would have condemned their actions in the past. We, again, point up to the fact that Chairman Arafat has made a courageous decision, that serious efforts are being made to crack down on terrorists, the necessary plans were provided on time, prior to entry into force, and clearly the Palestinian Authority's efforts to implement this agreement are generating the kind of extremist hostility that some have long predicted. Nevertheless, the Chairman, despite these threats appears ready, willing, and able to follow through with his commitments. We certainly applaud that courage.

QUESTION: This plan is in both American and Israeli hands. Today was the--I guess, the day that?

MR. RUBIN: I can't be specific as to whose hands it is in. The committee that deals with this is a bilateral committee between the U.S. and the Palestinians.

QUESTION: But the plan has been delivered--an action plan?

MR. RUBIN: Those things that needed to be done prior to entry into force have been done. There are modifications and adjustments and expansions and details that get filled out if you look at the timetable after entry into force. There's certain things that need to be done upon entry into force, and they have been done.

QUESTION: You don't seem to want to be specific, but there was a lot of attention on one major thing--the plan of action?

MR. RUBIN: Right and that's happened.

QUESTION: That's happened, okay.

MR. RUBIN: Yes.

QUESTION: This plan of action you talk about--I'm a little unclear--I'm sort of under the impression it's--is it a piece of paper, a binder? Is it more of a--a committee meeting?

MR. RUBIN: I think those are details that security people will work on, and there is no need to make it public.

QUESTION: Okay, but is this something that literally had to be given--or is it--is it a meeting or?

MR. RUBIN: I am not going to be more specific than that. What they needed to do prior to the entry into force has been done.

QUESTION: Well, what--what they needed to do was begin cracking down on?

MR. RUBIN: No, it specifically says in the agreement--and I'll be happy to read you that section--if you would like me to do that--is upon entry into force--"this Palestinian security work plan shared with the U.S. pursuant to section 2A.1B," which refers to the Palestinian- American committee that works on this.

QUESTION: That's--that plan has been shared, that's what you're saying?

MR. RUBIN: I think I've said that, yes. I don't know how to be more clear about it.

QUESTION: But you used to the word shared, yes?

MR. RUBIN: I've said as much as I can on this.

QUESTION: The groundbreaking on new houses at Kiryat--(inaudible), obviously you opposed them. But is this a violation on the ban of unilateral actions?

MR. RUBIN: Well, with respect to that issue, we are seeking further information about it. Let me be very clear that the--Section 4 of the agreement states that the two sides will immediately resume permanent status negotiations on an accelerated basis, then it continues, Section 5:

"Recognizing the necessity to create a positive environment for those negotiations, neither side shall initiate or take any step that will change the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in accordance with the interim agreement."

In our view, we would not want to see unilateral actions of this kind taken. But we are seeking additional information. With respect to Ras al- Amoud, which has come up in the same context, the Israelis have assured us that there will be no building there.

More generally, let me say that if we go back to business as usual, that means undermining the confidence that has been created at Wye, we will be out of business. So it's very important in the coming weeks on both sides for both sides to understand that their actions and statements can undermine the very confidence that we have put back on track through the Wye River process and the agreement that resulted from it. If we go back to business as usual in these areas, we will be out of business.

QUESTION: You said your seeking further information that?

MR. RUBIN: Right.

QUESTION: What--I mean, what's the problem there? As far as I know there's no secret about the fact that this groundbreaking ceremony took place on 200--

MR. RUBIN_: Right, the specific nature of it is maybe no secret to you. But before we make pronouncements on subjects of this type, we like to get all our facts together. We have not done that yet.

QUESTION: So you're not saying then that this would be an example of going back to business as usual?

MR. RUBIN: I specifically pre--pre-somethinged that sentence with the phrase "in general." What would the pre be?

QUESTION: Prefaced?

MR. RUBIN: Prefaced. (Laughter). Thank you. Prefaced.

QUESTION: Jamie, did the Secretary talk to the Prime Minister about that housing at Kiryat-Arba?

MR. RUBIN: She did discuss the issues that are of now concern to us, including the implementation and other subjects that were just discussed.

QUESTION: Final status negotiations.

MR. RUBIN: Expected to begin this week. My understanding is they will occur without the presence of the United States. They will be bilateral. But we'll have to see if the timing for that, the language of the agreement is the two sides will immediately resume permanent status negotiations with the goal--and make a determined effort to achieve the mutual goal of reaching an agreement by May the 4th, and we do expect that to happen.

QUESTION: When?

MR. RUBIN: I don't have--it's between the Palestinians and the Israelis. It would be unlikely and not with American participation for us to announce the location or venue for such discussions.

QUESTION: High-level?

MR. RUBIN: Don't know yet. I wouldn't expect them to start at a high level, though.

QUESTION: Can you be any more specific as to the dates?

MR. RUBIN: Of what?

QUESTION: Of the start of those talks?

MR. RUBIN: No.

QUESTION: I'm just curious, do you expect to be seeing Minister Sharon here in the next few weeks with a--being to referred to as 20-year plan for finishing final status talks?

MR. RUBIN: Well, I don't know what the topics would be. I do expect him to see--Secretary Albright has had many conversations with the new foreign minister of Israel. If he's in the United States, I would expect them to meet--not every time. But I would expect them to have a meeting, the extent to which the meeting will cover the issue you mentioned, I wouldn't want to presume in advance.

QUESTION: That would be the near-term?

MR. RUBIN: Near-term, yes--days, weeks.

QUESTION: What is the next step now that the U.S. has this security work plan? Does it--what is supposed to happen? Is it supposed to then go on to this trilateral committee? And what is the timetable for that?

MR. RUBIN: Well, pursuant to the agreement, which I hope to memorize shortly so that I don't have to keep going to it, upon entry into force, the Palestinian security work plan is shared with the U.S., full bilateral security cooperation resumes, trilateral security cooperation committee starts, and entry into force week two, the security work plan implementation begins. The committees will have started by then. An illegal weapons framework is in place. An implementation report will be in place. So if you go through the timeline and the agreement, it's spelled out.

Week two--as I understand week two--and if I make a technical error here, please forgive me, is the second week after the entry into force.

QUESTION: And it's entered into force this week?

MR. RUBIN: Today.

QUESTION: Today.

MR. RUBIN: So that would mean two weeks.

QUESTION: Two weeks from today.

MR. RUBIN: Within two weeks. I think the--week two. Some may get focused whether it is the beginning of the week or end of the week, so let me just focus on week two.

QUESTION: So the agreement enters into force even though Israel--the Israeli Government hasn't approved it?

MR. RUBIN: From our standpoint, it does. Of course we recognize that there are legal-political issues that need to be resolved, but we don't see any reason those issues need--we don't anticipate them changing either side's fulfilling of its responsibilities. It's also quite clear that Chairman Arafat and Prime Minister Netanyahu spoke to this. Neither of them expressed concern that this issue was going to derail the memorandum, as far as I can tell.

QUESTION: Do you feel a little blind-sided by this second approval that Netanyahu has brought up with the Knesset?

MR. RUBIN: It is based on--as a nation of laws and a democratic nation, we understand the differences between the issues that arise in democratic countries based on the rule of law which sometimes include details like this.

QUESTION: Did it ever come up, though?

MR. RUBIN: Every issue came up at least once. I can assure you. We had plenty of time to talk about everything. The extent to which this was discussed I don't know.

QUESTION: Is there anything that the Israelis have to do in the next week which they may not be able to do because the Knesset has not approved?

MR. RUBIN: No.

QUESTION: Another--go ahead.

QUESTION: Are you on this subject or a new subject?

QUESTION: New subject.

MR. RUBIN: My understanding is, as I indicated, that based on the schedule of a cabinet meeting shortly and a Knesset vote shortly thereafter and the timetable in the Wye memorandum, there is nothing standing in the way of the timetable being implemented and both sides fulfilling their responsibilities on schedule.

QUESTION: Thursday--the Israelis--prime minister's office said Thursday is when the Knesset will take it up, so that is still--

MR. RUBIN_: Within the time frame I just stated, but I wouldn't want to tell you when another government is going to have a vote--other than to say that based on our understanding of their timetable for approval in the Knesset, approval in the Cabinet, that we anticipate the responsibilities of both sides being fulfilled pursuant to the timeline in the agreement.

QUESTION: I want to ask a couple of questions about the diplomatic career of Cody Shearer. Did the events happened as recounted in this morning's Washington Times? Did the State Department cut these contacts off? What impact, if any, did they have on Ambassador Gelbard's mission? And is this case closed?

MR. RUBIN: I am going to have to get someone who is involved in this rather low-level incident to respond in detail to your question. Let me say from this podium that Cody Shearer did not engage in any official or unofficial negotiations on behalf of the U.S. Government at any time. With respect to what he did do and what steps were taken about it, I would rather refer you to those involved. But I certainly can say that he did not engage in any official or unofficial negotiations on behalf of the U.S. Government at any time. What he did do and what he stopped doing and all that I would like to get someone who is involved in it to talk to you directly.

QUESTION: Primakov and Yeltsin. I think it has been reported--and I think reliably--that Mr. Yeltsin is now incapable of functioning effectively as president for even an hour or two a day, so essentially Mr. Primakov has taken over for as long as three months, I understand. Is that the understanding of the United States?

MR. RUBIN: You and I are obviously not reading the same reports.

QUESTION: Okay. What does the United States understand about Mr. Yeltsin's health? And has Mr. Primakov, in fact, become the de facto vice president of Russia?

MR. RUBIN: I don't want to make, you know, statements about who is a de facto what in another government. But let me say this, we have seen press reports indicating that President Yeltsin may consider steps leading to changes to the Russian constitution which might alter the structure of the Russian Government. We do not have any evidence that President Yeltsin has actually taken any steps at this time. With respect to his health, on October 26, President Yeltsin canceled the planned trip to Austria for health reasons. His spokesman said that doctors advised against travel and that the Russian president needs more to recover. We understand President Yeltsin is now in a Moscow sanitorium. We wish President Yeltsin a speedy recovery.

Prime Minister Primakov has a full mandate to move forward on economic policy. We do not believe this development will or should get in the way of the economic decisions that are going on there to put Russia back on a firmer financial footing. President Yeltsin remains Russia's popularly elected President, and we will continue to work with him on that basis.

QUESTION: Do you think, though, this man--Mr. Yeltsin is able to work. Is that your reading?

MR. RUBIN: Contacts the United States has had with President Yeltsin in various meetings, the accounts have been made quite public of the extent to which the President and others have felt able to... (break)... He went to Sochi. So, please that is old information about him being in a Moscow sanitorium. In previous interactions people have found him an able interlocutor on top of the subjects that needed to be discussed.

QUESTION: Just finally.

MR. RUBIN: Yes.

QUESTION: It is also reported that he is having heart spasms--they call it--and is in great pain and distress and is--his attention is rather diverted to his health. Do you have any comment or conformation on this?

MR. RUBIN: Clearly being in the sanitorium and now in Sochi, the health is an issue, and we wish him a speedy recovery. I don't care to comment. I am not a doctor, and we are not doctors on the specific nature of any of his specific illnesses.

QUESTION: Did the team that was there from USAID and USDA, did they actually come to an agreement on food aid, or the Russian requests for food aid?

MR. RUBIN: Hot off the presses. In response to a formal Russian Government request, a team from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the State Department has been in Moscow since last Thursday discussing possible U.S. assistance with food procurement. This team's discussions with Russian officials continued over the weekend. The two sides are discussing the size of possible food procurement assistance and the conditions under which it would be offered. Pending further communication with our team in Moscow we have made no final decisions on possible assistance.

QUESTION: The situation in Central America ....

MR. RUBIN: Just one second, any more on Russia?

QUESTION: The situation in Central America is devastating. Do you have anything on that?

MR. RUBIN: Our Ambassadors in Honduras, Belize, Nicaragua, El Salvador and Guatemala have declared a disaster in each of these countries. We have a monitoring group in the State Department that have been working on this.

The Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance has provided more than a million dollars for the funding of the U.S. Department of Defense fixed-wing and helicopter aircraft to assist with delivery of relief supplies including food, simple cooking stoves, blankets, and medical supplies and for local private voluntary organizations for the purchase and delivery of local relief supplies.

The Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance will provide rolls of plastic sheeting, 10,000-liter water bladders and thousands of five-gallon jugs of potable water. The first airlift carrying relief supplies arrived in Honduras on October 31st and the second on November the 1st. Three additional airlifts will deliver supplies today and tomorrow. Additional emergency relief efforts will be considered by the Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance once assessments of needs are completed.

We have sent personnel to each of the countries to assist with coordination of arrival and distribution of relief supplies. The Southern Command of the United States is deploying CH-47 and UH-60 helicopters as well as C-130 aircraft to the region. With respect to specific amounts, and where they are going and how much has been delivered, I recommend you speak to the Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance, or the military airlift, to contact the Department of Defense.

QUESTION: New subject?

MR. RUBIN: Yes.

QUESTION: What is the latest on the Yugoslav Army and Special Forces pull out from Kosovo?

MR. RUBIN: Let me say that Assistant Secretary Julia Taft assessed the humanitarian situation in Kosovo this weekend, met with some of the humanitarian folks there. She reported that the humanitarian situation has improved since her visit in August. She highlighted our commitment to help Kosovars return and rebuild their lives. Today, she is meeting with Montenegrin officials to express support and appreciation for Montenegro's continued humanitarian efforts.

With respect to returns, our reports from monitors in the region is that the return of internally displaced persons is accelerating. At one particular camp which previously housed 3,000 or 4,000 IDPs--it looks like all the residents of that camp at Kisna Reka, have returned to their homes in Komorane. The number of shelterless IDPs has also dropped significantly. Food convoys have been getting in.

With respect to the military side, there were no significant violations of the cease-fire or incidents of ethnically motivated violence reported over the weekend or this morning. Seventy-four Americans arrived in Belgrade Saturday to join the monitoring effort to verify compliance with the conditions of Resolution 1199. This should raise the number of persons, including Russian and other Europeans attached to and working on verification to over 200 people. Ambassador Walker, whom some of you met last week, departs for Europe this evening. NATO approved on Friday the activation order for the air verification regime, and U.S. air surveillance flights, as you know, both manned and unmanned began on October the 17th. Ambassador Hill is in Belgrade today, meeting with President Milutinovic of the Serbian Federation. He plans to be in Pristina very soon.

With respect to the KLA, there are some KLA personnel that are in areas where the Serb police have drawn back. For the most part there has been cooperation on the part of the UCK with the necessary cease-fire and withdrawal of Serbian forces. We hope this restraint will continue. As far as the actual bean count of the forces, I don't think anything has changed since last week, which was a time when we were giving out certain numbers.

QUESTION: Any more general figures on the number of IDPs that there still are within Kosovo. Do you think that the humanitarian crisis or the danger of such a crisis is over now?

MR. RUBIN: Certainly, the humanitarian situation has greatly eased. The prospect of a humanitarian catastrophe has been avoided. There are still problems. But Assistant Secretary Taft is there trying to assess what remains to be done. Clearly, people are returning to their homes, and this great danger of tens--if not hundreds--of thousands of people without shelter in the winter and without food has been averted through the work of NATO and the United States. That is where it stands now. We can't rule that the problem is going to resume. But right now the trends are in the right direction.

QUESTION: Is the KLA not supposed to be taking up the positions abandoned by the Serbian forces?

MR. RUBIN: I didn't say that. I said there's no agreement between the United States and the KLA on that. What I indicated in previous comments on the subject was that we recognized that there is going to be some of that going on. That's a reality of Kosovo. Until we get a political solution to the problem in Kosovo, there is going to be this kind of territorial control back and forth going on. We don't think that the people of Kosovo without the Serbs there need a police force or need a KLA force to come in and start provocations. Both sides must--and we have made this very clear to the KLA--not initiate military hostilities.

With respect to the Serb response to that, let me just repeat what I've said in the past which is that we think we will be able to distinguish--especially as the numbers or verifiers grow--between a Serb self- defense response to a provocation and a Serb wholesale attack on civilians as a result of relatively minor incidents. That's where we are going to have to draw the line, unless and until we get a political settlement.

QUESTION: There were reports that the Serbian Kosovars--the minority--the 10 percent minority are quite frightened, afraid of their Albanian Kosovar counterparts and the KLA. And you're saying that there have been no attacks so far--no incidents of the KLA or for that matter the majority?

MR. RUBIN: I can't rule out an incident here or there. But I think that generally speaking there has been no significant violations of the cease- fire.

QUESTION: And the KLA then is keeping the cease-fire?

MR. RUBIN: Yes.

QUESTION: The trial of the deputy prime minister of Malaysia began today. Could you give any comment on that, especially given the fact that the President of the United States is getting ready to go there with a number of other world leaders?

MR. RUBIN: Well, let me start on the second part. There is a pattern around the world where there are meetings that are scheduled on a certain basis. One doesn't cancel a meeting because of the policies and practices of the host country. But I think we have made clear that we are not going to be having bilateral discussions with the Malaysians while we are there. We are there for the meeting of APEC and not as part of any bilateral support for what's going on there. We have serious concerns about what's going on there.

With respect to the trial, let me say it's the first day of a trial that could run for several weeks. It was largely focused on procedural matters. We note the attorney general's statement that trials--that is the Malaysian attorney general--on the remaining six charges will begin in December and run through June, 1999. In addition, Anwar will face further unspecified charges of misconduct at a time yet to be determined. We believe that Anwar should have the opportunity to defend himself in fair and open trials, and we will continue to monitor these proceedings.

We certainly see no reason why diplomats and journalists who have complied with the court-stated procedures for entering the courtroom should be arbitrarily prevented from doing so. We want to see this trial be as fair and open as possible.

QUESTION: Was it an American diplomat barred from the courtroom?

MR. RUBIN: The chief justice had also announced that seating within the courtroom would be open to all spectators on a first-come, first-serve basis. Based on this information, U.S. and other diplomats and local and international journalists began lining up outside the courtroom early in the morning. At least six diplomats, including the U.S. embassy representative, who was second in line, were prevented by bailiffs from entering the court. While some international journalists were allowed in, several others were denied entry.

We believe that given the enormous interest in this trial, it is in Malaysia's interest to follow the policy announced by the high court and allow spectators to observe the trial on a--first-come, first-serve basis, including representatives of international and local organizations, as well as diplomats.

QUESTION: So just--I guess you were as clear as could be, the U.S. representative was second in line and he was not allowed--he or she--

MR. RUBIN_: Correct.

_QUESTION: --was barred from the courtroom?

MR. RUBIN: Correct.

QUESTION: Thank you. With no apparent explanation?

MR. RUBIN: Correct.

QUESTION: Has there--was there a protest of some kind?

MR. RUBIN: I'll have to check.

(The briefing concluded at 1:30 P.M.)


U.S. State Department: Daily Press Briefings Directory - Previous Article - Next Article
Back to Top
Copyright © 1995-2023 HR-Net (Hellenic Resources Network). An HRI Project.
All Rights Reserved.

HTML by the HR-Net Group / Hellenic Resources Institute, Inc.
std2html v1.01b run on Tuesday, 3 November 1998 - 16:21:03 UTC