![]() |
Compact version |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
Sunday, 25 August 2024
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
U.S. Department of State Daily Press Briefing, 01-07-12U.S. State Department: Daily Press Briefings Directory - Previous Article - Next ArticleFrom: The Department of State Foreign Affairs Network (DOSFAN) at <http://www.state.gov>DAILY PRESS BRIEFING Richard Boucher, Spokesman Washington, DC July 12, 2001 INDEX: STATEMENTS TRANSCRIPT_: MR. BOUCHER: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. If I could talk about a couple things at the beginning, and then we will get on to your questions about these or any other matters. First, on the peace talks in Northern Ireland, I want to say we are pleased that the British and Irish Governments and the parties to the Northern Ireland peace talks have considered that sufficient progress has been made in the recent round of negotiations to resume their talks on Friday, July 13. We urge, of course, all the parties to make a maximum effort to resolve the outstanding issues required for the full implementation of the Good Friday agreement. In addition to continuing to address constructively the issues of policing, demilitarization and establishing the stability of political institutions, there must also be substantial progress on decommissioning. We are concerned that failure to resolve these issues could contribute to heightened tensions and instability in Northern Ireland. We urge all parties to exercise restraint and to redouble their efforts to reach a political accommodation that will make real the promise foretold in the Good Friday agreement. Any particular questions about that? Elaine? QUESTION: The British Government has made somewhat of a deal out of the fact that media and others have begun to focus more on the need for IRA disarmament as a way of unlocking the disarmament knot. Is that something that this government sees? MR. BOUCHER: As I think I said in the statement, there are a number of issues that need to be addressed constructively. But there also must be substantial progress on decommissioning. That is a very important part of the picture for us. QUESTION: (Inaudible.) MR. BOUCHER: Decommissioning needs substantial progress. I'll leave it at that. Moving along, we will be putting out a statement on the death of an Uzbek human rights activist. But I will leave that one for the paper version for you all to see. And I just wanted to mention that the Agency for International Development has put out a brief statement about the travel of Andrew Natsios, their head of the Agency for International Development but also the Special Humanitarian Coordination for Sudan who is traveling to Sudan, to northern and southern Sudan for a seven-day assessment mission. He will be going out to see first hand what the humanitarian situation is in Sudan. He will meet with Sudanese government officials, nongovernmental organizations, and UN representatives, visit camps for people who have been displaced by the conflict and the drought and talk a lot with nongovernmental organizations about how we can improve and support our relief operations and their work in the area. The United States has been the largest donor of humanitarian assistance to Sudan during the span of the country's civil war. We have provided over $1 billion of assistance in the past decade. And this humanitarian situation in Sudan is of grave concern to us. It is very serious, and Mr. Natsios is going out to see what we can do more. QUESTION: Do you know when he is leaving? MR. BOUCHER: He is leaving on the 13th. He will begin the trip in the region, he will be in Khartoum on the 15th, and he will end up July 22 in Nairobi, Kenya. QUESTION: How high in terms of the Sudanese government in Khartoum will he meet with? MR. BOUCHER: I don't know what specific meetings he will have at this point. I don't think that there is a meeting like that scheduled, but I just don't know how it will turn out. QUESTION: And will his assessment have any bearing on the decision that was made, I guess, a month-and-a-half ago to begin food aid to the north? MR. BOUCHER: I'm not quite sure what "have any bearing" means. We decided a month or so ago, around the time the Secretary was in Africa, that we would begin providing food assistance to the north through nongovernmental organizations. He will be looking at the situation in the north, look at how we do that, and look at how we can make sure we do that well. QUESTION: But there have been reports from the region that it has been very difficult for some of the AID workers to do what they are supposed to do. Will there be at some point an assessment -- I guess what I am asking, you know, there is only so much we can do in a civil war. MR. BOUCHER: We see both -- there are many problems in Sudan, many difficult policy issues as well. War and drought have created an enormous humanitarian problem. And we are working on the humanitarian situation, and that is what Mr. Natsios is going out to address, and he will be looking at all those factors and how, within that context, we can best deliver the aid and make sure it gets to the people that need it. That's what we really need to do right now. QUESTION: The President had a somewhat different spin when he addressed the issue a couple months ago, suggesting that there was -- that the people for whom the assistance had been intended has not been reaching them. Is that -- you put a somewhat different cast -- MR. BOUCHER: That has been true in some cases. I think the way to describe this is a trip to look at the situation, to look at what we need to do and how we can improve the delivery of assistance and make sure the people who need it do indeed get it. That's why he will be going out, to make sure that we are doing everything possible in the best way possible to help out. QUESTION: Have you picked an envoy for peace -- MR. BOUCHER: Not yet. That is the end of announcements, so questions on this or other subjects? QUESTION: A different subject. The Jane's series of publications, one of their reports, has published a story about Prime Minister Sharon having a plan to -- a military plan that if the violence continues at a certain level, that he has a plan to destroy, in effect, the Palestinian authority. My question is not to comment on that, but my question is, during the recent trip, Secretary Powell -- or at any other time, when Sharon was here for that matter -- has the US been made aware of any such plan by Sharon? And was the US asked for a green light whether -- MR. BOUCHER: I don't know of anything that I would describe that way in terms of our conversations. Prime Minister Sharon has made clear that he intends to try to establish security. We have always urged him to exercise restraint and to establish security by cooperating with the Palestinians, by working with them, by avoiding provocation and incitement, just as we have made clear to both the parties that they need to do everything they can. We may ask for the maximum efforts from the Palestinian side to curb the violence. We have also asked for restraint and cooperation in security matters from the Israeli side as well. QUESTION: That doesn't exactly answer the question. Has he said what he -- or has he indicated what he might do if calm didn't prevail? MR. BOUCHER: I have not been in every single meeting we have had with Prime Minister Sharon. So I can't say absolutely that the subject never came up. It never came up in any meeting that I was in with the Secretary and Prime Minister Sharon. And we did not give a green light to any military action. QUESTION: Can I move onto a new subject? The Maddux family is saying it is going to ask this building for help to secure the extradition of Ira Einhorn, who cut his own throat in front of French television cameras in attempt to avoid his delivery to American justice today. Do you have anything to say on that? MR. BOUCHER: Not on his personal circumstances, or French television. I can review where we stand on the judicial process. The decision by the French court today, as far as we understand it, ends the French judicial process and the extradition case, and we welcome that decision denying the appeal. We are obviously following developments very closely. We hope for a prompt return of Mr. Einhorn to the United States to face justice. The US has worked intensively on this matter. We work closely with the French Government as well. We are very sympathetic to the family of Holly Maddux and the suffering that they have gone through. And we hope to see Mr. Einhorn extradited to the United States. QUESTION: What -- does it affect somebody's extradition if they are injured? I understand his condition is not life-threatening, but he is in hospital. MR. BOUCHER: I don't know. That is really a judicial question, and the Department of Justice would have to take care of it. QUESTION: Is there any other sort of European mechanism that could delay his coming back here? Are there any other kind of overall judicial game- playing that could go on? MR. BOUCHER: I don't know. QUESTION: Have you heard -- MR. BOUCHER: I just don't know -- no. I am just saying this ends the French judicial process. Whether there is some broader European process that one can go through, I just don't know. QUESTION: New subject? MR. BOUCHER: Please. QUESTION: Can you talk about reports of a memorandum sent to US diplomatic posts around the world about how we might come into conflict with the ABM treaty during upcoming missile tests? MR. BOUCHER: It won't surprise those of you who see me walk out with my big book every day that we do try to inform our officers of what our policy is and what they might say about it, and we did so with a cable to our embassies that went out to all our embassies and diplomatic posts about a week ago, that lays out the President's arguments for a new strategic framework, that lays out the implications of that for missile defense, for the need for missile defense and the kind of missile defense we might be wanting to build, and which lays out the questions and answers and issues involved with the ABM treaty for our diplomatic officers overseas, so that they can advocate the US position, so that they can support our efforts and hopefully convince people overseas that this is necessary. Enough of you have gotten hold of this document, it's an unclassified cable, to see that it really parallels closely what the President said in his speeches, what he said in his press conference with President Putin and the other things we have been saying. Also, I would say in general, none of the material comes as a surprise to the allies because we have been talking to them in a series of consultations. You will remember the trips made by Mr. Hadley and Mr. Armitage, Mr. Grossman, Mr. Wolfowitz and others a couple months ago. In terms of the overall policy and the goals laid out by the President, we are seeking a new strategic framework that encompasses a broad area with a number of steps from offense to defense to nonproliferation. And it is being laid out by the Deputy Secretary of Defense in testimony on the Hill today. So I don't think I have much to add to what he says. QUESTION: Would you like to respond to the reaction of a senior Russian official in Moscow, who believes that it's -- well, has described it, the policy of consulting Russia, as a smoke screen for the genuine intent, which is to move away from ABM, with or without Russian agreement. MR. BOUCHER: Is this before he listened to Mr. Wolfowitz's testimony or after? QUESTION: I can't check that one -- MR. BOUCHER: I can't check that either. But I would say, if he did listen to Mr. Wolfowitz's testimony, he would see quite clearly that we made clear there what we've made clear all along, that our goal is not somehow just to break the ABM Treaty. Our goal is to have an effective missile defense, to work cooperatively with allies, friends and partners in doing that, to move beyond the constraints of the ABM treaty, and that with regard to Russia, our goal is to work this out and reach an agreement with Russia on how we go about putting in place a new strategic framework. That's what the President did when he met with President Putin, what the Secretary has done in his meetings with Foreign Minister Ivanov, and that is what we will continue to do. QUESTION: Richard, do you have any fresh words on the International Olympic Committee decision due in 24 hours? MR. BOUCHER: We try not to be fresh around here. No. QUESTION: Can I follow up? There's still talk on the Hill of a resolution opposing China's bid. Do you think that this resolution is unhelpful, problematic? MR. BOUCHER: I wouldn't characterize it one way or the other. I think everybody has a right to express her opinion. QUESTION: During the EP-3 plane incident, there was talk in the Administration of opposing the bid, that Secretary Powell had said that you're not sure what the Administration was going to do. Why did the Administration end up backing up from taking a position? MR. BOUCHER: We have never taken a position in the past, and we haven't taken one this time. We don't have a government vote in the International Olympic Committee. If the US Government isn't called upon to take a position, we don't take one. QUESTION: I believe the White House is going to announce or they have already announced the nomination of Otto Reich today. MR. BOUCHER: I believe they might, and it's a White House thing, and if they do, they do; if they don't, they don't. And I'll leave it to them for the moment. QUESTION: Has there been any contact between the State Department and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee regarding this nomination? MR. BOUCHER: I don't know if there has been any contact yet, but obviously he looks forward to and we look forward to any nominee, if he is - - does become one -- looks forward to cooperating fully with the committee. QUESTION: New subject? I think it was yesterday Rand Beers testified before a subcommittee panel and said that with Plan Colombia, no American pilots would be piloting Colombian -- these helicopters that we're giving to the Colombians. Do you -- can you talk a little bit about any phase-out into -- with these new helicopters? MR. BOUCHER: He knows this subject much better than me, and whatever he said I'm sure is correct. But I don't know it. I don't have anything on that. QUESTION: For the last couple days, the Khmer Rouge Genocide Law finished its progression with the assembly in Phnom Penh. Does the United States see this now as a sign that the trials will start soon? I mean, does it consider that Cambodia should move quickly towards that? MR. BOUCHER: We see it as very much a step forward in the process. We have been a strong supporter of bringing to justice the Khmer Rouge leaders, who bear most of the responsibility for the atrocities committed between 1975 and '79. We think it is important that there be accountability in Cambodia in order to promote rule of law and to develop democracy there. We have always insisted that the extraordinary chambers must proceed in an open and transparent manner in full view of Cambodian society and the international community. We hope that the remaining steps for the establishment of the tribunal proceed quickly and in a way that meets those criteria. QUESTION: Can I do one more subject? Sorry. The lawyers for Gao Zhan apparently are going back just to see her in the last few days. Can you say whether you have had any contact with them? And also whether your request to witness any trial of Gao Zhan has been answered yet by the Chinese, and any updates on the other cases? MR. BOUCHER: I don't think there is too much new on this. We do know that from -- we know from Mr. Jerome Cohen, who is her US-based attorney, that he has been in touch with her Chinese attorney, and that she has met with her Chinese attorney for about two and a half hours on July 10th. Reports are that she is in good health, and that the Chinese attorney was able to deliver some personal messages. Mr. Cohen, I think, has said that he is happy to follow up and answer any further questions on this, and rather than do this from somebody who had heard from somebody who had heard from somebody talking to him and bringing you one step closer to the situation. We are continuing to urge the Chinese Government to promptly resolve Ms. Gao's case, as well as the cases of the other detainees so that they can be returned to their families. But I don't have any specific dates or that kind of information on Ms. Gao yet. QUESTION: About Secretary Powell's Asia trip? He goes to Hanoi for ARF meeting. Is he going to meet with the North Korean Foreign Minister? Any arrangements? MR. BOUCHER: No new answer to that yet. They will be at the same meeting. It is possible that they could meet, but there is nothing set at this point. QUESTION: Also, when he visits Tokyo, prior to that, Japanese Foreign Minister Tanaka may be out of the country. And are they going to meet, or is the Secretary meeting some other people, like the Prime Minister? MR. BOUCHER: I haven't seen the exact schedule yet. I can't give you the meetings yet. QUESTION: Thank you. MR. BOUCHER: Thanks. [End] Released on July 12, 2001
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |